I disagree with @smooth and agree with @rainman

1. Anonymous speech is indeed important. But only done without the harm of others. When impersonating Dan Larimer (imitating the name counts as impersonating) it has a hurtful intent. If anyone want to exercise anonymous free speech, let them do that under an anonymous account. Imagine a 100 accounts with the name @smooth making posts. Wouldn't you get hurt by that?