Ok, interesting Idea, but here is an interesting question:
How does the sell sbd for steem will drive SBD price down? For me It doesnt make sense.
If the initiative would be to drive SBD closer to 1 usd, then this SBD should be sold at exchanges for BTC(or usd is possible), then the BTC should be used to buy steem at the same exchanges, and then back to steemit account.
Trading It on internal market Will only drive the steem price up, wich Will discourage people to trade their SBD for steem, because they Will get less steem/SBD (unless you people are Trading on both ends). Actually this would encourage to sell their steem
After reading the "Rules and update" post, it seems @burnpost is about flagging spam, selling SBD for STEEM to exert downward market pressure, and to eventually burn the STEEM.
My question is, has the flagging been occuring? I may simply not know the correct tool to fact check, however looking at SteemDB in the Votes section (I believe a flag is simply a vote that goes against the post), @burnpost seems to not be voting at all..
However, it's sitting at 98% voting power, rather than 100%, so for "not voting for 2 months", it must be doing something. That being said, if it was a bot flagging known bots/spammers automatically, it should be hovering around 80% voting power to constantly be maximizing its effectiveness I would think.
Can anyone shine some light on how I would validate it is doing its job against spamming? Or did I misunderstand "stop spammers and similar forms of clear abuse" to mean flagging, when it is accomplishing it some other way?
@burnpost delegates essentially all of its SP to @mack-bot, which flags spam constantly (also a smaller amount to @spaminator), leaving only a small amount of bandwidth so the account can function.
Unfortunately I don't know of a tool to show currently active delegation (without a program to use the API), but you can find the delegation actions in the transaction history for @burnpost if you search for them
Ahhh it delegates to @mack-bot. That makes a lot more sense. Thanks for the clarification. Awesome project :)
After taking a look into those bots, I decided to donate a bit of SP to them. It's not much, but I can delegate a few percent of my SP to this noble of a cause
Proof of burn
Author reward 321.498 SBD and 77.574 STEEM POWER for burnpost/steem-experiment-burn-post-99
Sold 319.734 SBD for 273.912 STEEM on internal market
https://steemd.com/tx/1352456921e02d805a454205ff137d969bf476e6
Power up of 273.912 STEEM since SBD > $1 (+0.001 donation)
https://steemd.com/tx/683ea93f8326123fd10a562e54c4883ef6b99cc6
What is this all about?
basically this post is meant to devalue/downvote the voting system. Kinda like devil's advocate for voting i suppose lol
i dont know too bro
I, too, don’t know too bro, bro.
wkwkwkwk sorry that my english is not perfect
Apology Accepted
I too don't know too too
Ok, interesting Idea, but here is an interesting question:
How does the sell sbd for steem will drive SBD price down? For me It doesnt make sense.
If the initiative would be to drive SBD closer to 1 usd, then this SBD should be sold at exchanges for BTC(or usd is possible), then the BTC should be used to buy steem at the same exchanges, and then back to steemit account.
Trading It on internal market Will only drive the steem price up, wich Will discourage people to trade their SBD for steem, because they Will get less steem/SBD (unless you people are Trading on both ends). Actually this would encourage to sell their steem
After reading the "Rules and update" post, it seems @burnpost is about flagging spam, selling SBD for STEEM to exert downward market pressure, and to eventually burn the STEEM.
My question is, has the flagging been occuring? I may simply not know the correct tool to fact check, however looking at SteemDB in the Votes section (I believe a flag is simply a vote that goes against the post), @burnpost seems to not be voting at all..
However, it's sitting at 98% voting power, rather than 100%, so for "not voting for 2 months", it must be doing something. That being said, if it was a bot flagging known bots/spammers automatically, it should be hovering around 80% voting power to constantly be maximizing its effectiveness I would think.
Can anyone shine some light on how I would validate it is doing its job against spamming? Or did I misunderstand "stop spammers and similar forms of clear abuse" to mean flagging, when it is accomplishing it some other way?
@burnpost delegates essentially all of its SP to @mack-bot, which flags spam constantly (also a smaller amount to @spaminator), leaving only a small amount of bandwidth so the account can function.
https://steemd.com/@mack-bot
https://steemd.com/@spaminator
Unfortunately I don't know of a tool to show currently active delegation (without a program to use the API), but you can find the delegation actions in the transaction history for @burnpost if you search for them
https://steemd.com/@burnpost
Not sure if this is what you are looking for but steemreports.com has a tool for that.
http://www.steemreports.com/delegation-info/?account=%40burnpost
Thanks for the link! That's exactly what I was looking for
Ahhh it delegates to @mack-bot. That makes a lot more sense. Thanks for the clarification. Awesome project :)
After taking a look into those bots, I decided to donate a bit of SP to them. It's not much, but I can delegate a few percent of my SP to this noble of a cause
Get over, and read it again and again......and again
Very funny picture:)
I am very inspired with your post@burnpost
This definitely deserves to be trending because of its quality content and thought provoking ideas.
My favorite part is definitely when you say “post for.” It really made me think deeply, and touched a chord with me emotionally and spiritually.
Great picture ("-")
Thank you very much. Your post was very essential for everybody
This unquestionably should drift due to its quality substance and intriguing thoughts.