You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Open letter to @steemalliance and private "witness-slack" community
Personally, I would like to use an on-chain asynchronous communication app that behaves like https://zulipchat.com
Personally, I would like to use an on-chain asynchronous communication app that behaves like https://zulipchat.com
What happens when people run out of RCs. They're just muted? Spend a bunch of money some people don't have to buy more? Does this really seem like a productive way to go?
Steem is not all things to all people for all purposes. That's unrealistic.
@smooth That's why I said on-chain and not Steem.
Also, it will be something similar to the proposal here : https://www.sbir.gov/sbirsearch/detail/1466795
@bsameep had came up with the idea independent of the above.
I'm not sure there are any blockchains which are much more scalable than Steem (though there may be some in the future) which means any attempting to do the same things will run into the same sorts of capacity constraints, though the details will differ. A lot of these projects are addressing the issue by way of ignoring it, wishful thinking, or even false claims.
@smooth See the link I shared - its the same bitshares 2.0 core + chainbase and the proposal is by our own @blocktrades :-)
Okay, in that case it will be right around as scaleable...
Yea. @bsameep originally came up the idea in early 2018 when RC's were not a thing. Not sure whether this has much of relevance. Though the proposal from @blocktrades given away looks interesting to me.