Is there any trails for the ref accounts yet or is it a waste if time if a ref downvotes then will the tokens be at zero ?? Trying to find the best way possible to help the refs in their job
Is there any trails for the ref accounts yet or is it a waste if time if a ref downvotes then will the tokens be at zero ?? Trying to find the best way possible to help the refs in their job
This is an interesting concept I haven't really thought down much.
The way the referee system works is that it takes downvote input from the 9 @referee# accounts and then downvotes a post after it's 4 days old until its payout date (upvotes stop counting after 4 days) if 4 @referees all agree. The way it determines downvote application is based on what the referees each vote their % to be. If they all vote 100% then it will take 100% of the reward from a post but if they vote an average of 65% then @referee will only try to remove 65% of the rewards. No referees hold any SPORTS so no single voice is the voice of the moderation team.
With users trailing a @referee# who's voice they trust they could effectively outsource their downvoting to someone who's habits they trust. In the end it's still not @referee# with power only that another user has decided to follow their role. This would also assist @referee as it would have to use a lower amount of downvote power to remove rewards if a post met consensus as the trail would presumably vote before @referee checked consensus to vote. I think I like it @blanchy.sports!
From my understanding it has to have a certain number of ref votes before rewards are removed. If you see something you don't think is right just hit it and stick it in the replay room. 2.5 downvotes a day gives you the power to remove 15 000 tokens a day or so which is more than 20 Steem.