You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Steem Social Lab: we need a "charter"
The idea is good, but I am not convinced that it will work. Who shall create the charta? How shall we vote for different versions of it? Where shall it be stored, so that steemians can find it?
Who is gonna reading the rules?
People are different and I think the charta will come automatically by talking with others. We create a culture by using steem. It stays fluent.
Achim
Posted using Partiko Android
That is natural, people are skeptics by nature. You need to seek for yourself arguments pro and con with an open mind. Look around you - have similar efforts ever worked ? I gave one specific example which has been a roaring success, Médecins Sans Frontières. But there are others. Think of the Christian religion for instance. Nobody was convinced it would work at the beginning. Then there were 12 guys who started believing and following Jesus around. Today, it is one of the most successful religions of the world ...
Yes, we are at the beginning of something big (maybe not as big as a religion, but the comparison is good, they also have a charta(but also a lot of rules)).
I thought, that we may put some rules into the calculation of the reputation. For example, if people upvote their self, than their reputation doesn't grow that fast, as if you don't do it.
What do you think about this first sign?
Posted using Partiko Android
I think that would be sensible. But a truly meaningful "reputation" would come from outside the platform. The one we have inside the platform is a kind of derivative indicator which is mildly useful