RE: Why Steem curation reward is needlessly unfair and how to fix it
Above examples are based on using rshares * rshares
as weight for reward distribution among posts. That said, if post A has 2x
of rshares
in comparison to post B, then total reward to post A is 4x
of reward to post B.
While one's weight%
to a post is near linear to current rshares
of the post if she votes late, the reward she can get is also near linear to current rshares
of the post. That said, by adding a vote to post A the voter will get around 2x
reward in return in comparison to voting on post B.
This is the reason why the algorithm described in OP encourages voting on already popular posts. If we want to encourage people to find new quality post, it's likely we need to make the weight for reward distribution among posts linear to current rshares
or less.