Curation Efficiency Statistics - 2019-11-09 12:00 AM UTC
Curation Efficiency Statistics
Every 24 hours, this report is automatically generated to display the best 25 curators in the last 7 days (minimum 35 full votes - 3500% upvote strength - casted in that time frame)
- The first leaderboard will be the best 25 curators in the last 7 days with a total value of votes casted between 0 and 1$
- The second leaderboard will be the best 25 curators in the last 7 days with a total value of votes casted between 1 and 10$
- The third leaderboard will be the best 25 curators in the last 7 days with a total value of votes casted above 10$
It's the time of the vote that is taken into consideration, whether the posts the votes are casted on are payed out or not
The 25 Best Curators in the last 7 Days [O$;1$[
# | Username | Total Votes Value $ | Curation Rewards Value $ | Curation Efficiency |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | attention-seeker | 0.465 | 0.463 | 99.66 % |
2 | best-strategy | 0.220 | 0.218 | 99.21 % |
3 | tech-coin | 0.706 | 0.681 | 96.49 % |
4 | coinmarketcal2 | 0.595 | 0.572 | 96.08 % |
5 | daijiworld | 0.539 | 0.518 | 96.07 % |
6 | sm-silva | 0.325 | 0.295 | 90.78 % |
7 | steemfond | 0.493 | 0.438 | 88.89 % |
8 | sirbush | 0.172 | 0.149 | 86.68 % |
9 | samboy | 0.596 | 0.513 | 86.05 % |
10 | morwen | 0.939 | 0.803 | 85.51 % |
11 | foodhelp | 0.583 | 0.494 | 84.75 % |
12 | janaveda | 0.566 | 0.479 | 84.68 % |
13 | steemconsole | 0.932 | 0.767 | 82.27 % |
14 | vestlife | 0.192 | 0.156 | 81.19 % |
15 | vgalue | 0.178 | 0.145 | 81.16 % |
16 | discovery-it | 0.528 | 0.427 | 80.94 % |
17 | pondcrosser | 0.667 | 0.534 | 80.06 % |
18 | arv1 | 0.925 | 0.740 | 80.00 % |
19 | zintarmortalis | 0.860 | 0.682 | 79.31 % |
20 | el-panal | 0.258 | 0.204 | 79.00 % |
21 | gabriellecd | 0.256 | 0.201 | 78.61 % |
22 | richjr | 0.485 | 0.379 | 78.01 % |
23 | the.curator | 0.708 | 0.550 | 77.74 % |
24 | thebumplunderer | 0.758 | 0.588 | 77.55 % |
25 | thesoundof | 0.184 | 0.142 | 77.33 % |
The 25 Best Curators in the last 7 Days [1$:10$[
# | Username | Total Votes Value $ | Curation Rewards Value $ | Curation Efficiency |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | curx | 4.327 | 4.477 | 103.47 % |
2 | whatsthatcryptom | 2.740 | 2.645 | 96.53 % |
3 | apix | 9.211 | 8.839 | 95.96 % |
4 | shea851 | 1.470 | 1.386 | 94.31 % |
5 | benedict08 | 7.345 | 6.919 | 94.21 % |
6 | mosquito76 | 5.659 | 5.148 | 90.98 % |
7 | hdu | 8.397 | 7.430 | 88.48 % |
8 | ancient-light | 2.003 | 1.766 | 88.16 % |
9 | coinmarketcal | 6.249 | 5.468 | 87.51 % |
10 | sameer777 | 1.624 | 1.420 | 87.45 % |
11 | steem-d-anlovnit | 1.365 | 1.189 | 87.12 % |
12 | xiguang | 7.917 | 6.823 | 86.18 % |
13 | votes4minnows | 2.576 | 2.186 | 84.86 % |
14 | inciter | 3.414 | 2.895 | 84.79 % |
15 | steemitasclub | 4.558 | 3.846 | 84.39 % |
16 | delabo | 6.349 | 5.346 | 84.21 % |
17 | eliel | 3.130 | 2.627 | 83.92 % |
18 | reazuliqbal | 4.732 | 3.954 | 83.57 % |
19 | ezravandi | 2.835 | 2.364 | 83.37 % |
20 | teofilex11 | 3.842 | 3.195 | 83.17 % |
21 | ebargains | 1.014 | 0.840 | 82.77 % |
22 | la-colmena | 1.884 | 1.558 | 82.70 % |
23 | dirapa | 6.664 | 5.497 | 82.50 % |
24 | angelesdesteemit | 5.165 | 4.250 | 82.29 % |
25 | pataty69 | 3.598 | 2.951 | 82.04 % |
The 25 Best Curators in the last 7 Days [10$:∞$[
# | Username | Total Votes Value $ | Curation Rewards Value $ | Curation Efficiency |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | art.int | 175.580 | 177.240 | 100.95 % |
2 | gerber | 42.744 | 39.923 | 93.40 % |
3 | miti | 18.289 | 17.018 | 93.05 % |
4 | delishtreats | 14.492 | 12.822 | 88.47 % |
5 | steem.services | 29.055 | 24.997 | 86.03 % |
6 | runicar | 26.272 | 22.400 | 85.26 % |
7 | luxbet | 15.980 | 13.095 | 81.95 % |
8 | mehta | 13.697 | 11.223 | 81.94 % |
9 | webdeals | 33.200 | 27.121 | 81.69 % |
10 | mustard-seed | 10.623 | 8.631 | 81.25 % |
11 | karja | 36.836 | 29.306 | 79.56 % |
12 | tangofever | 13.819 | 10.907 | 78.93 % |
13 | spt-skillup | 30.129 | 23.730 | 78.76 % |
14 | reveur | 16.220 | 12.692 | 78.25 % |
15 | nicestbot | 18.824 | 14.669 | 77.93 % |
16 | discernente | 14.753 | 11.317 | 76.71 % |
17 | penguinpablo | 132.646 | 100.810 | 76.00 % |
18 | bluemist | 68.087 | 51.733 | 75.98 % |
19 | accelerator | 54.114 | 40.883 | 75.55 % |
20 | enjoyinglife | 10.670 | 8.060 | 75.54 % |
21 | robmolecule | 17.975 | 13.557 | 75.42 % |
22 | dado13btc | 10.156 | 7.644 | 75.26 % |
23 | funnyman | 23.905 | 17.535 | 73.35 % |
24 | aicu | 37.011 | 27.107 | 73.24 % |
25 | mindtrap | 42.982 | 30.717 | 71.46 % |
If you have any suggestions, want more / less / other data, feel free to ask, and I'll do my best to incorporate them !
upon which criteria do you decide what weight to vote with?
The higher the potential payouts, the higher the curation rewards to be distributed, the higher the vote can be.
My bot aims at keeping a steady ROI, so if he can choose between voting at 100% for a potential efficiency of 115% or voting at 1% for a potential efficiency of 125% (the smaller your vote, the higher the efficiency, that's the formula). So if he currently aims at 120% efficiency, he will vote at 50%.
I'm simplifying but that's the spirit.
This brightens up my knowledge, thanks. It's nice to see vote efficiency rise by just following your curation trail. Makes me think about powering up or lease some SP. A little profit always comes in handy ;). Seems that the votes go across the platform, so that's another plus.
Thanks for sharing!