Is the goal of Switzerland legal? Brazil wants VAr judgment

In the inaugural match of the World Cup, Switzerland had 1-1 goals in the 1-1 goal, five times World champion Brazil However, Brazil Confederation still thinks that if the referee did not make two wrong decisions in the match, they could have left the field with the win.

But that was not supposed to happen. This is a special technology that has started using the World Cup for the first time. The work of this technology called VAR is that if any incident happens in the field from the referee's eyes or if the referee makes a mistake, then correcting that mistake by watching the replay. In this, a number of referee decisions have been changed with the help of VAAR.

Using this technology, France got a penalty against Australia. He won the match by winning the match in France. Again yesterday South Korea vs. Sweden's match in the D-box deteriorated a bad tackling incident by the referee. A player of Sweden has been receiving VAR for a long time in the context of an appeal from the referee. Obey the referee, the decision was wrong. It will be a penalty. And the penalty was scored by the team captain Andreea Grankiewicz, who gave Sweden victory.

In the Brazil match, the team made the equalization of the goal of Steven Jubber for Switzerland. Brazil's objection with that goal. Brazil thinks that Jubo had made his marker Brazilian defender Miranda before taking the advantage, and took advantage of himself. If he did not do that, he could not properly head. The victims of Miranda Fowl The referee did not listen to hundreds of Brazilian players on the field that day.

Brazil's second charge against Swiss defender Manuel Aakonji Brazilian striker Gabriel Jesseus was caught and thrown in the D-box but the referee did not give the penalty. Brazil thinks that if taken help of VAR technology, it would also have been penalties. Only the question did not stop Brazil, FIFA has filed a petition in the most popular way.

In an application to FIFA, Brazil asked for two things: VAR Assistant Paulo Valerie asked the original referee to look at the decision. The referee himself wanted to verify the decision? According to the rule, the VAR was not foul after the goal was made immediately after the goal. Did the VAr do not think that the foul was replay? Did the referee know whether it was foul?