You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Targeted again by more losers. Please flag into oblivion.
What is really funny is that this poor guy thinks we are "mad." I find the dishonest means of making money through exploiting people's compassion unpalatable. The free market of Steem is speaking.
@Kafkanarchy84, capitalism should not tell people how they can or cannot make money. That is freedom. When you start to try to dictate the rules, the morality, through subjectivity or maybe objectivity, you begin to regulate maybe too much and you begin to centralize the process of determining who can money and how they can make money.......... but it becomes your system..... you become the king or the God of the world when you start to tell people that they are breaking the rules of the supply and demand for economics, for capitalism.......
.
While you tell some people that they cannot make money this way or that way or another way, you are therefore emphasizing that this one issue or person or whatever is a bigger problem then how the Democrats and CNN and many people have been given financial support from terrorists......
.
So, you are saying this is so much worse than terrorism.......... and you are saying this either directly or indirectly regardless of whether it is or is not your intent... regardless of whether you know it or not..... you are asking for bigger government..........
.
Steemit and Bitcoin is against that kind of regulation that you call for.............
When did I tell anyone how to make money? This is a stake-weighted voting platform. Do you get that? That means stake holders can use their votes (up or down) as they please. What exactly is your angle here?
I never told anyone how they can or cannot make money. You sound ridiculous.
I flagged him btw..
Gonna hijack upper post this to bring attention to something a bit interesting.
Currently, this post has 90 upvotes. While my post has a total of 12 votes. Why aren't all the people upvoting this post coming to downvote my post?
Few possibilities might be
A) They see it's already low enough and don't bother
B) They auto-upvoted this post and aren't even online
C) They upvoted for some of that sweet sweet creation reward and actually didn't even read the post.
If C is even the least bit true, then that would indicate major problems with steemit.
One more thing...
Right now this post is worth $120 and will give kafka a nice little payout, but is it really worth that?
There are hundreds of other actually somewhat interesting posts that aren't valued anywhere near as much despite being of actual substance and not lazy low quality drama.
Currently, the community is saying that a post about some retard telling people that some other retard made a shitpost is more valuable than the art, recipes and the majority of other posts on this website.
Once again, I would like to thank kafka for bringing attention to my posting for I believe it helps to point out some of the flaws with steemit that will hopefully be corrected when more knowledgeable and level-headed witnesses take over.
Maybe you are retarded and don't realise that upvotes and downvotes burn VP the same way. I think this post has enough visibility, I follow this user, have done for a long time, and you, sir, are a moron. Now, I have another two flags to apply with my other account.
Well obviously they do, but there shouldn't be a difference of 80 votes.
And good on you for having multiple accounts, as you could tell from the post but I'm a huge supporter of multi-accounting. It's really profitable.
I have @elfspice, because I owned that name back in 2002, on DMT world and The Hive. You might not even be old enough to remember these sites.
I discovered about 6 months ago that some asshole had taken the name @elfspice and was poncing around pretending to be me.
How would you feel about that? Do you think you would have grabbed the account name on Steem if some asshole had been ruining your reputation in the rest of thte interwebs?
It was worth a try, at least.
Just go seach the hive archives you find here and there. Go read some @elfspice posts. See if you don't recognise my writing and my obsessions.
I remember hearing about them, never bothered with them though because the arcade machines said that winners don't use drugs.
I mean, that really just depends whether or not you really care what others think about your screen name and its "reputation." I guess it also depends on if you identify with your screen name or believe yourself to have some claim to ownership over it.
Personally, I don't believe that online reputation matters in the slightest or that an account name is any actual signifier of who a person is.