It simply states that among competing hypothesis the one with the fewest assumptions should be selected.

Not that I defined Occam's razor in my above statement, but you've apparently combined two sentences from my statement to form that opinion; assuming you're attempting to "correct" what you perceive to be an error. That said, Merriam Webster does define it in this way ...

a scientific and philosophic rule that entities should not be multiplied unnecessarily which is interpreted as requiring that the simplest of competing theories be preferred to the more complex or that explanations of unknown phenomena be sought first in terms of known quantities.

And I maintain ...

I have no idea what's really going on.

...

Everyone knows planets are flat

If you believe all planets are flat, that's your prerogative; and an interesting counter-perspective to the status quo which is interesting to research. Personally I have no idea and can't individually prove either to be fact, but I do like researching all ideas others put forth. There is certainly some push back to science these days and I can see why considering reports in recent years stating the majority of scientific studies cannot be replicated by others. There's a lot of faith and dogma on all sides it appears. :)