You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Why I Disagree With The Strategy Of Exiting Facebook, Twitter And YouTube
The point is that there's not magical information that will free people, or make them aware. You want to reach the low hanging fruit, not the one that has yet to turn colour. How can you have a conversation when you can only discuss certain things, or where the enviroment it counter to that, you're essentially going against the graind and you won't get anything but splinters.
That why journalists need to stay put, and inform as many people as they can.
One at a time. Just like I inform you and keep informing you, just as long as it takes.
I can only hope you see the light..
Then splinters it will be.
We'll get there as long as we don't give up on eachother. If we leave the sleepers behind then we have lost, as they will keep dreaming when there nolonger are journalists around who try to wake them up.
I hope i get my messagage accross. And that you can try to see why Cait is trying so hard to make you see. And me even harder right here right now. I'm greatfull to have this discussion with you, and I'm well aware that you care just as much as I do. Yet Cait is seeing the bigger picture more clearly. And she is way better informed then me.
There are A passing back and fort of information but it's got no meaning, so it's meaningless. Journalists don't wake people up, they share some news. What will people be more aware of? Choices that they have no influence over and things that are outside their control? Why torment those poor people with the fact that these controlers are relentless, can you see that 2/3 vote by not voting, the only mandate that exists? You cannot rush the fruit to Fruit.
Now it is time to get your head out of the dark place. Without journalists we now would be in the middle of a Hillarious Clintonian World War III
Ok, that's from the spectacular tea-leaf reading, and as if Trump has somehow de-escalated conflict one bit. What if Hillary won, she tried to start WW3, it failed, she went to jail, and by now people would be trying to figure out exactly how to move forward. What if Trump had won REGARDLESS of Hillary, and in spite of anything? Yeah, fucked up that whole rationale, because at the end of the day, journalists share some news, you really think that the Defense Contractors, the Governmental Conglamorates, they care who the TEMPORARY EMPLOYEE is? You think that Trump is somehow not a complete RETARD when it comes to de-escalating WW3? You think that he's not better than your Guaranteed Psychopath? You know what he said to "what are you going to do with all this money mr. trump?"... It's not world peace, it's not help or support some cause, unless that cause is more money, to which when questioned like the Drive-Through Scene in Dude Where's My Car: And then? ...
He's a fool, he's a retard, he's not "better" at de-escalating shit. The journalists on the other hand, they actually fool themselves into "waking people up" as if the people have a choice over who the Temporary Employee of a Company is, and as if with that choice even, they are some kind of Directors when in fact that Employee cares ONLY about the Company and what the ACTUAL directors and Trustees say, because the role of Master and Servant isn't confusing but obvious and can never be confused. What Am I In Denial Of? That Your Tea-Leaf Reading Actually Amounts To An Argument Over The Fact That 2/3 Of People Don't Vote, Therefore The Only Mandate That Exists Is That There Is No Democracy. (this is a republic, after all, bottom up, not top down).
https://steemit.com/facebook/@chozai/why-deleting-facebook-won-t-work-but-what-will
Read,
Think,
Read again,
Think again,
Keep doing that until you see the bigger issue.
I'm not here to fight you. But if you refuse to look at the real issue then I can only agree to disagree.
So please read the article, I really hope that explains also to you why @caitlinjohnstone is 100% correct.
@bifilarcoil
Is there a reason why you didn't address one thing I said? I don't think I need to follow a link, I expect that you can copy paste the issue here if such an issue even exists.
Yes, I'm glad you noticed.
Keep thinking about that as well.
Again. I know your point of view and I can see why you think that may be a good way to deal with it. Yet i don't agree with it and therefore I gave you a link with all you need to know to get the insights that you may need.
And still you are free to disagree. Just like me.
I show you reasons why,
You show nothing to come even close to convince me otherwise.
So you could even be correct. If you can convince me I'll be happy to change my mind.
So what's the Issue again? I skimmed through the article and there is nothing novel or intriguing about it, lest the clarification I was looking for regarding this "big issue". Is the big issue Anonymity or Privacy? Shouldn't any and every article that touches mildly on those topics start with the fact that Microsoft has built in spy backdoors in every windows environment and the ramifications of trying to have Privacy in such an environment? The point I was making is that you cannot Tea-Leaf read the future to warn of what you think is hilarious and what is harrowing to even consider. I then explained that the people don't have a choice over the directives of this Private Corporation or the Principals of the corporation and the mockery of temporary employee that they are given a "choice over" is invalid by their own LOGIC of demo-cracy (mob-rule) which Man-Dates that from this day forth the Majority (mob) chose so,and without fail they have CHOSEN not to participate, the irnoy and imbecility of the fact could never be more important and damning to any conversations about the so called "government" which is neither federal nor public(re-Public), and you seem to suggest that people should head to the top of the fruit tree and pick the still fuzz covered pre-flowers instead of the low hanging fruit, because they will be "forgotten" otherwise. Either you give them so little credit that having their support would be like loading up sandbags into a hot air balloon to gain altitude, because with their confused and misunderstood roles of citizen and sovereign they would only in turn be making a mockery out of discourse by their lack of consistent and pointed rationale, they would be velhelmently decreeing that government is Trump when it's Demonstrative(chartered under the UN Inc,France- Jaccob Rothscild) and Definitive (treaty of peace), or rob them of the potential for discovering things themselves at their own pace, either way confounding them to causes and events that wouldn't affect them and even less things that they can affect which is generally a concern for their safety and wellbeing, being content with nothing much so to speak, but the basics.
You bring up Hillary but you don't find it hilarious that Trump is the left field that the controllers could rely upon to blindside people with the false foolish sense of hope?
What would you do if you were to find out definitively that the plan was always for the left field play as is right now, or that even if Hillary would have won, they would have sacked her in a second, heck she could have had a coming to white jesus moment also but that AS-IF-WW3 is in the hands of a Temporary Employee!? Yet, when you look at our current foreign involvement and the narrative pushed by Lump is eerily convenient for consistent escalation, sanctions and really, who's choice is it, Trumps or the Advisors!?
An affirmation and "bits of advice" that is neither pointed nor elucidated on doesn't amount to a response in kind, only a lack of substance. We can banter for days or actually have a discussion with consideration in kind.
I showed consideration when I responded and asked specific questions, unlike your response thus far. You are free to consider that last part an opinion.
http://annavonreitz.com/jacobrothschild.pdf
http://annavonreitz.com/jacobrothschild2.pdf
You want them to see what? What they are already well aware of but cannot affect anything against? I appreciate the dialogue, but you are having it here not only because Facebook is dead, but it is happening because of some people (looks at caitlin) who think that Facebook isn't dead. Facebook died the moment I left Facebook, I and others leaving directly caused dialogue to cease and move to other places, and that echo-chamber, the carcas that once was, can and should rot, as is natural.
Now you contradict yourself a bit. If Farcebook is already dead then why would it matter at all to be or not to be there? Then we would not be having a discussion right now.
Do you like to see your children or friends play with sickly rotting things? The Discussion happening is precluded by facebook being dead, facebook is a carcas, show me a similar discussion there, lets see all the chemtrail, pizzagate and other discussions happening on facebook where people share their stories, vaccines? cps? yeah good luck with that, that's why this is happening here, and not facebook.