Hello, @bookoons!

Thank you for your contribution. This is a very interesting project, and I can't wait to see what the future has in store for Snax. I appreciate the fact that you took the time to promote this tool, however I have a few issues with your review.

First and foremost, even though I like all the information provided, I have to admit that I wanted to read more. Content creation is about volume, and I think that your review would have been a much better one if you had shared more information about your personal thoughts and experience with this tool. Your personal views is the unique feature you can add to your blog posts, and this is the kind of content we particularly like.

Moreover, the post lacks unique information about the project itself. You only wrote two paragraphs about Snax, and most of the information provided can be found elsewhere on the internet. We value your personal knowledge and experiences, and I hope to see more editorial content in your future submissions to the blog category of Utopian.

Last but never least, the post did have minor style and proofreading issues, but not to the level where it hurt the reading experience. To sum up, this is an interesting review, but also one that lacks editorial content.

Your contribution has been evaluated according to Utopian policies and guidelines, as well as a predefined set of questions pertaining to the category.

To view those questions and the relevant answers related to your post, click here.

Need help? Chat with us on Discord.

[utopian-moderator]