You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: SmartCash SplitFork Coming To Give Power Back To The Community
All I can say ... was thinking of going into Smartcash. Now after reading this, I feel a hell of a lot more informed and am quite glad I didn't.
@cambridgeport if you really want to be informed then you should not believe everything you read, do some digging. If you do you would find out that the team behind this so called split is made up of ex -hive and squad members fired for one reason or the other some including theft, and trolls kicked out for antisocial behaviours. I would be very careful to join a team of with people who have demonstrated low morale especially when handling funds.
https://steemit.com/smartcash/@blockchainlib/important-security-update-for-the-smartcash-tipbots
In your opinion, is Smartcasht now decentralized? What's going on with the proposals?, why all of then have been rejected? Thanks
@juanete20 there are two parts to the proposal story. There is the fact that there has not been any really good proposals and the community is voting them down because proposals similar to them have failed to deliver. There is also the part that not enough details to allow an educated decision be made are included in the proposals. As to if the voting is decentralized I say yes as I nor anyone I know has ever voted on a proposal as part of a block.
Voting is easier than ever now with integration with the Web Wallet and Node Wallet. So more people are voting. At least 33% of proposals have passed to date. With the lower price, lower quality of the proposals currently, and over 40 currently operating proposals it's not surprising that more voters are saying "wait".
Some tips on successfully passing a vote: https://forum.smartcash.cc/t/having-difficulty-getting-your-proposal-passed-try-these-7-easy-steps-to-improve-and-try-again/5119/6
Rejected proposals are not the core problem on smartcash. There's a lot of things going wrong and "team members" likes them like this.