I'm operating on the level of information that people provide as arguments. Grumpy asked a question, drakos responded with this post which delivers the main argument that grumpy downvoted that post.

Then drakos also says one should ask you about it, and since you're apparently ALL knowing on this matter, I'm wondering why you don't enlighten us with more facts. I'd check if you have any interesting posts about it on your account, but I can't be bothered to scroll endlessly through 95% re-steems. Mostly blaming Steemit for not providing a hide option for those, but as of now I'd ask you to kindly point toward a good resource representing your perspective and arguments. It doesn't really help if you just tell me "You're wrong, but that's no wonder, you can't know what's going on, like I do" Maybe I was just wrongfully assuming that your side of the conflict is trying to spread awareness and possibly find supporters. I mean you seem to be doing fairly well on your own and probably don't need someone like me with next to no power at all, so I suppose if you want others to keep out of it that would be fair as well.

I've stated it before, but I'm not trying to side with anyone. Last time your side was throwing around insults and swears, this time it's grumpy with the tags. I've seen both. You're right, I don't know all that much of the history between you, but nor do any of the other average Steemit users. Conclusions that are in my opinion misleading like "grumpy downvoted post x, who wanted to share the reward with y, therefore grumpy enjoys stealing money from y" are still easy to point out though. I mean, if someone considers that to be 'stealing' or even 'finding enjoyment in stealing', then so be it, but I don't.

Wishing you a good day as well. Definitely hoping you can eventually resolve this conflict.