self-taught or study with the teacher ...??
WHERE ARE THE CHOICES THAT MAKE A SMART ... self-taught OR study with the teacher ???
Best wishes to you guys steemians ....
Life that matches it is life that makes a person be remembered even if someone has vanished in time. An eternal life that makes man remembered by the good he has as long as he lives. Life that provides benefits to other humans is not life that gives distress. Life progression that makes a person eager to keep on stepping and grabs what he wants. Of course this life is a life that is based on science. He was the Science that even though the owner was gone, still made the name of the owner fragrant.
Science is everyone's dream. But to get it is not an easy thing. However, the acceleration of world development makes people assume to take things easily and quickly. People will act quickly to pursue the progress that they have seen before their eyes. Including science itself. The development of science is so rapid in this world, making people increasingly challenged to find easy ways to get it.
The community paradigm of the importance of science or more precisely education, makes people drain their own minds so that they can easily get education and of course with a relatively shorter period of time. These factors make the community split into 2 groups. The first group is a group that chooses to walk alone to get education, this community will act aggressively to utilize various types of educational media, both electronic and print media.
Public awareness (group one) of offering educational facilities both in print and electronic media makes the community number them to be utilized, he forgets that there are other facilities and media that he can use to get education, say school. However. For the first group, by means of at least making the position of the School indirectly forgotten and considered not important in the process of getting education.
While the second group is the group that chooses an educational institution which certainly has didactic in the teaching and learning process.
Self-learning is a practical way to gain cognitive potential. Various intuition that could make people skeptical in taking this self-taught path was never ignored. Even intuition is forgotten as the learning process is automatically executed.
Self-learning will only explore students' skills in the cognitive potential part, while the affective and psychomotor potential will be ignored, because autodidact learning does not make the participants trained to have those two potentials. Automatic learning will not only give birth to scholars who have no ethics in behaving nor do they have other capabilities that should be owned.
Being a smart person by taking the autodidact path will certainly be easy to get for those who have optimal ambitions, abilities and efforts. But behind the intelligence that he has achieved, this person will lose other skills that he can use to make other people reach intelligence like he has. Certainly such valuable pedagogic abilities are wasted because of the path he chose.
From here, someone's credibility is needed to learn from other people, more precisely looking for an educational institution which has a didactic commanded by the teacher, because the essence of Demanding knowledge is not just being smart but also making other people smart with the potential, they get from the teacher.
After he was directed by his teacher, it was appropriate for him to walk alone ( self-taught ).
Choose autodidact or study with a teacher ??? Choose yourself.