RE: A pilot and engineer's handbook to flat earth truth.
Great post my friend. Excited to see others using critical thinking and logic and not just submitting to whoever or whatever one tells you to think or believe. Check out my recent post regarding some very interesting findings I made concerning the measurements that we are told for the ra-dius and diameter of the Earth, the Moon and the Sun. Very interesting stuff. I think you may enjoy. We are being hoodwinked as to where we live and who we are I feel. This world is indeed a stage and we have been fed lies pretty much everywhere, all of the time. Great work again. I found your page via the "Mac DeMarco" post you made. Very interesting indeed as well. I feel you are on to something about him. I had my suspicions as well, especially with the "This Old Dog" album cover and his appearance on late night wearing a masonic shirt. I have found the band Deer Tick doing the same sadly. What is interesting about "Mac's" current name is it has to do with "Mars", or the "Yang" side of the Yin Yang symbol. "Mac" can mean a "a form of address for a man whose name is unknown to the speaker" and "De" can mean "down" or "off". "Marco" can be "an Italian baby name. In Italian the meaning of the name Marco is: Mars (Roman god of war)." Not sure what to make of this or if he intended his name to mean this. But I do find it interesting with what you posted about him, the various occult and masonic titles of his songs, along with his odd behavior and infatuation with acting androgynous and kissing other guys. Perhaps there is more going on here that we still do not know...yet? Anyways great work my friend. Namaste. :)
Hey man, thanks! I have three Mac Demarco posts but I think you're referring to the last one. In my first post I call him out for being a goat-riding sellout. He 's a false idol for the kids leading them down the left path of ignorance and evil. Mac Demarco, like all celebrities, is a round earth shill and might not be aware of it.
Ok... a bit of critical thinking from me.
Can anyone explain how the star "tracking perfect circles" (Figure 1.2) doesn't disprove the FE? The centre of rotation is clearly not in nor close to zenith, meaning the photo was taken in a place not very close to the North Pole. What is the shape of the firmament (rotating and with stars glued onto it or whatever you think it is) so that the observed trails are circles? Shouldn't they be noticeably elongated ovals when observed from at least some spots on Earth? To my knowledge, they are no such places and on the FE model I commonly see (firmament symmetrical over the North Pole), the star trails are supposed to be circular only if observed from the North Pole (and more elongated the farther from the North Pole you are).
On the other hand, the speeds of the Earth, Sun and the Milky Way doesn't disprove anything. It just means all the stars are so far away, the distances traveled by the Earth within few hours of the creation time of a long-exposure photo are not affecting the star trails in a noticeable way.
Same thing with the Figure 1.4. The constelations look the same from any place on Earth. If the stars lied on a surface not very far away from us, two observers at two different locations would view the surface of the firmament from vastly different angles (and distances), hence the constellation shapes (and sizes) between those two observation positions would differ noticeably. It's not the case. Am I missing something?