I completely agree on everything except believing that it is a noble cause that has not been carried out, the "disinformation" is when someone denies something out of ignorance, many people know the climate change and its points in favor and still deny it, no I am defending his point of view, I do not want to take this into this field either, but we can not qualify all those who are detached from the scientific community as "uninformed", no one is the only possessor of the truth, imagine if these tactics or strategies are they were applied in the period of obscurantism and clerical absolutist power.