New Study from PNAS Finds Vaccinated Adults More Likely to Spread the Flu than Unvaccinated Adults!

---

---

The Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (PNAS) reports that vaccinated people (mainly young adults 19-21) emit 630% more flu virus particles into the air than unvaccinated people.

Air-borne flu particles emitted via e.g. sneezing and coughing are believed to be the primary reason behind the spread of influenza. The study also raises questions about the veracity of herd immunity.

It seems that the herd may in fact be the carriers and spreaders of the flu.

The study is titled Infectious Virus in Exhaled Breath of Symptomatic Seasonal Influenza Cases from a College Community

---

---

The scientists screened 355 volunteers with acute respiratory illness. 178 volunteers qualified for the study. 156 (88%) were confirmed to have the flu.

Excerpts from the study:

Fine-aerosol viral RNA was also positively associated with having influenza vaccination for both the current and prior season… We provide overwhelming evidence that humans generate infectious aerosols and quantitative data to improve mathematical models of transmission and public health interventions… Our observation of an association between repeated vaccination and increased viral aerosol generation demonstrated the power of our method, but needs confirmation.

The study observed an association between repeated vaccination and an increase in flu viral particles from e.g. coughing and sneezing.

The association of current and prior year vaccination with increased shedding of influenza A might lead one to speculate that certain types of prior immunity promote lung inflammation, airway closure, and aerosol generation. This first observation of the phenomenon needs confirmation. If confirmed, this observation, together with recent literature suggesting reduced protection with annual vaccination, would have implications for influenza vaccination recommendations and policies.

If the study results can be reproduced it would mean that flu vaccinations lead to reduced protection.

Self-reported vaccination for the current season was associated with a trend (P < 0.10) toward higher viral shedding in fine-aerosol samples; vaccination with both the current and previous year’s seasonal vaccines, however, was significantly associated with greater fine-aerosol shedding in unadjusted and adjusted models (P < 0.01). In adjusted models, we observed 6.3 (95% CI 1.9–21.5) times more aerosol shedding among cases with vaccination in the current and previous season compared with having no vaccination in those two seasons.

If you were unvaccinated you were 6.3 Times Less Likely to Spread the Flu Compared to a Vaccinated Individual.

---

---

Sayer Ji commenting on the Cochrane Database Review

---

It is a heavily guarded secret within the medical establishment (especially within the corridors of the CDC) that the Cochrane Database Review (CDR), considered by many within the evidence-based medical model to be the gold standard for assessing the therapeutic value of common medical interventions, does not lend unequivocal scientific support to the belief and/or outright propaganda that flu vaccines are 'safe and effective.'

To the contrary, these authoritative reviews reveal there is a conspicuous absence of conclusive evidence as to the effectiveness of influenza vaccines in children under 2, healthy adults, the elderly, and healthcare workers who care for the elderly. Sayer Ji - Green Med Info

---

The Cochrane Data Review was conducted over 40 Years and included data from 75 Studies of Influenza Vaccination.

Following is the conclusion of the Cochrane Review titled Vaccines for Preventing Seasonal Influenza and its Complications in people Aged 65 or Older

---

The available evidence is of poor quality and provides no guidance regarding the safety, efficacy or effectiveness of influenza vaccines for people aged 65 years or older. To resolve the uncertainty, an adequately powered publicly-funded randomised, placebo-controlled trial run over several seasons should be undertaken.

---

Cochrane recommended a Placebo-Controlled Trial over several flu seasons

---

Over 200 viruses cause influenza and influenza-like illness which produce the same symptoms (fever, headache, aches and pains, cough and runny noses). Without laboratory tests, doctors cannot tell the two illnesses apart. Both last for days and rarely lead to death or serious illness. At best, vaccines might be effective against only Influenza A and B, which represent about 10% of all circulating viruses. Source: Cochrane Data Review Summaries

---

Conclusion: Flu Vaccines May be Effective in 10% of Cases

---

Canadian Study - Vaccines May Decrease Resistance to Infection

---

Flu vaccine among Canadians (2008-2009) increased the rate of pandemic H1N1 infection. Therefore, vaccines, may in fact decrease resistance to viral infection via their immunosuppressive actions. Association between the 2008-09 Seasonal Influenza Vaccine and Pandemic H1N1 Illness during Spring-Summer 2009: Four Observational Studies from Canada

---

---

Contrary to what the government, media and scientific establishment are telling you - the science is NOT settled. We have conflicting studies stretching back over many decades. It has not been scientifically proven that flu vaccines are even effective - so why are so many babies, children, adults and elderly receiving flu shots every year?

For the most part they get their annual jab because the media told them to. The doctor repeated the message during your visit. He got his information from the pharmaceutical company selling the vaccine, and his respective medical association and department of health. Family and peer-groups may further re-enforce the false belief of a need for the flu vaccine.

We, the citizens of the world are divided on this issue and that is not good.

We need to be discussing the data, all of it, not just the studies that the media, scientific academies, CDC and other bad actors tell you that you are allowed to trust. These entities are scientific gatekeepers. Did you hear about the above studies on the TV, radio or other mainstream media? Did your doctor tell you?

If you consume mainstream media you will no doubt have seen numerous reports re-enforcing the need to vaccinate. We are only being told one side of the story. It is not a fair, scientific, reasonable or balanced debate. It is an agenda to sell more drugs for pharmaceutical companies and you do that by keeping people in a perpetual state of sickness.

In the United States, people that believe that they have been injured due to vaccines are not allowed to have their day in court before a judge and jury. They *cannot sue the pharmaceutical company that manufactured the vaccine.

No matter what camp you sit in - that is unconstitutional, a gross miscarriage of justice and a huge slap in the face to the victims of vaccine injuries.

Instead we have a Vaccine Court that has paid out approximately $4 Billion to victims families since 1998*. The vaccine court compensates people that can produce strong evidence that the injury, disability, or death is linked to vaccinations. The Center for Disease Control (CDC) estimates that only about 10% of adverse events linked to vaccines are reported.

If all events were reported it is possible that $40 Billion could have been paid out.

Surely the pharmaceutical companies are responsible for paying the compensation claim you ask?

Nope, they call it a no-fault settlement and the taxpayers foots the bill.

This image is a snapshot from the homepage of the Health Resources & Services Administration which is responsible for governing the vaccination compensation program.

---

---

No-Fault means the **taxpayer foots the bill ** for the administration costs to operate the court as well as the compensation/damages claims that the vaccine court awards. The victims are required to sign a confidentiality agreement before they receive the payment i.e. a coverup and silencing of witnesses.

Big Pharma should be footing the bill. The victims are not at fault yet not only do they have to live with the injury or death, but they also have to pay all costs via taxation.

The government needs to stop rubber-stamping the approval, manufacture and distribution of the said vaccines, order a truly independent enquiry into corruption and collusion between government and the pharmaceutical industry and conduct transparent, scientific studies with the aim of reproducing the results that we find in the PNAS study at the top of this article.

That is not going to happen before medical professionals and scientists demand it. If you are in one of these fields I implore you to start asking difficult questions within your industry. More brave and honest whistleblowers are also needed. Please stop defending your sides position and come down from that wall and let’s work together and effect positive, lasting change.

The government, media, pharma and science is lying to all of us on this issue.

---

This is affecting every human being one way or another. Our governments have been covertly taken over by corporations - Big Pharma is not the only industry e.g. banking.

Big Pharma makes multi-billions in profits every year selling the vaccines that caused these injuries. Strong evidence was required to win those cases and I can assure you that they are not easily won. When you create the rules of the game you almost always tip them in your favor - that’s just plain common sense.

One has to be incredibly naive to not see the blatant corruption, collusion and injustices that are being carried out by the pharmaceutical industry and our elected officials.

Too many people were suing Big Pharma in the 70’s and 80’s and they were going to stop manufacturing the vaccines that were known to be causing the damage. That seemed like a sensible option but that’s not what happened. They just moved it out of the courts and into closed hearings and passed the expenses on to the taxpayer.

I hope that you are beginning to digest the magnitude of the situation that we find ourselves in?

We had a problem back then and we have the same problem today, only it’s much bigger now. Big Pharma never treats the source of the problem but always the symptoms. If people were healthy and free of disease they would be out of business. The symptoms on this occasion was law suits and loss of profits. Big Pharma suddenly started feeling very queasy so they lobbied their bought and paid for politicians and got them to change the law.

The most responsible way to avoid infecting other people may be to AVOID flu vaccinations.

---

If this study is correct and reproducible the herd is weaponized to spread the flu faster, and more widely than the unvaccinated. Parents that are choosing not to vaccinate their kids are being labelled as child abusers and there are calls from some quarters for the government to begin mandatory vaccinations.

Just last year a law was passed that allows the Center for Disease Control (CDC) to Detain, Quarantine or Vaccinate any person attempting to cross state borders that they suspect is carrying an infectious disease and fine anyone that doesn’t comply up to $250,000.

Imagine that you're at the airport and you have a cough, runny nose or common cold. An officer removes you from the security line and informs you that he is going to quarantine you on suspicion of you having a communicable disease* and ask you to receive the vaccination or be prosecuted and fined.

Oppressive laws such as this are rubber-stamped through Congress on an almost daily basis (across all agencies and pertaining to all aspects of our lives), in stealth and with impunity. Our civil liberties and freedoms are under direct attack from the corporations that bought our elected officials and governments before we were born.

Pro-vaxxers, anti-vaxxers and vaccine awareness advocates are all standing up for what they believe is in the best interests of themselves, their families and the wider community. Rather than in-fighting amongst ourselves, our time would be much better spent if we demanded more from our governments and elected representatives.

I understand that some of this may be challenging for you to blindly accept. It may even come as a surprise?

If that is you, I strongly encourage you to do your own independent research. Hear the evidence from all sides of this debate with an open-mind and a desire to discover the truth and come to your own conclusions.

Don’t be afraid to question the status quo. Don’t let the government and media tell you which studies you are allowed to read and which scientists and doctors to trust.

This problem exists because there are greedy, corrupt men in the world that prey on a public that (for the most part) trusts what the media, science and government tells them.

The human race (all of us) need scientists and medical professionals to lead the charge from within and tell the world what they know, see and suspect. This system is rotten at it’s core and we need tear it down and replace it with a decentralized one with all of the data on a blockchain.

We can do it. Thank you for reading.

Till next time…

Yours in Peace, Health & Truth
@SteemTruth

Related Posts

---

Only 6% of Drug Advertising Material is Supported by Scientific Evidence - British Medical Journal

Sources

---

GreenMed Info - The Shocking Lack of Evidence Supporting Flu Vaccines

PNAS - Infectious Virus in Exhaled Breath of Symptomatic Seasonal Influenza Cases from a College Community

Cochrane Data Review Summaries

Image Credits: 1 2 3