You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: An Answer for Civil Society

in #science7 years ago

I told you already, on the steemit chat, that there is no god particle. There is a Higgs boson, but no god particle. This is just a name media use. This is very upsetting. I know you said it in your post, but then just don't use this wording! Please don't play the media game.

In addition, the Danish expert you mentioned has not really said that what we discovered at the LHC was not a Higgs boson, but said that it could be something else too. The words matter.

During time, we known the atom is only composed of protons, neutrons, and electrons. But nowdays, after the discovery of the higgs-bosson the atomic constituents have increased, meaning that the first atomic compounds have only 3 but the atomic atoms are composed of 4 component, it is higgs-bosson or called also as "God Particle". So why it name should be as god particles?

This is wrong. There is no Higgs boson inside atoms. Atoms contain a nucleus and electrons, and the nucleus is made of protons and neutrons, that are all made of quarks and gluons. As you can see, no Higgs here.

The rest of your post is kind of sloppy on some aspects. I don't want to comment more, but I am tired people being alarmist for nothing.

Sort:  

im sorry prof, honestly i dont mean to alarmist on this post but i admit my fault to conclude each word that i took from the source i read. i removed some part which has been mistaken when i conclude it. thanks prof for advice, i just graduated of bachelor degree, i still need a guidance to create some content

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.23
TRX 0.25
JST 0.038
BTC 95317.76
ETH 3302.38
USDT 1.00
SBD 3.31