Observation of new phenomena at the LHC at CERN - flavor anomalies, beauty, charm and penguins
The Large Hadron Collider has collected so far a huge amount of data, and this will continue in the next decades. Several experiments are run around the LHC machine, which includes in particular the two general purpose experiments ATLAS and CMS experiments.
These are denoted as general purpose experiments because they are targeting the discovery of new phenomena in a very broad sense. However, nothing is observed in data so far.
[image credits: LHCb @ CERN]
There are however other experiments around the LHC, one of them being the LHCb experiment, whose detector is schematically represented on the right.
This experiment has observed unexpected hints for new phenomena that cannot be explained in the context of the Standard Model of particle physics.
Although we cannot claim any discovery yet, these hints are well admitted today.
This post is the follow-up of this earlier post of mine where I introduced LHCb and flavor physics. The new phenomena that I will discuss are indeed connected to flavor physics and LHCb.
QUARKS AND HADRONS
All the observed flavor anomalies are connected to B-mesons, D-mesons and kaons. And how better start a post as with nice names? I don’t know. But I will… go back to the basics first: quarks and hadrons.
As I explained it in a post I wrote almost a year ago on Steemit (yes, it is almost a year I am around! Time flies), there are several elementary particles and some of them are called quarks.
Quarks are particles sensitive to the strong interactions and their dynamics (or the way they behave) is dictated by quantum chromodynamics, or QCD in short.
The strong interaction is so strong (yep the naming ‘strong’ is not random… there is something behind) that it allows quarks to form bound states generically named hadrons.
Although there are six quarks in nature, only five of them contribute to the formation of bound states: the up, down, strange, charm and bottom quarks (the top quark decays before being able to do anything else).
[image credits: FNAL]
There are several classes of bound states, or hadrons, and they differ according to the underlying quark/antiquark structure. We have, for instance, baryons and mesons to name the most well known.
Each baryon is made of (roughly) three quarks (or three antiquarks), and the best representative of this class of (composite) particles are definitely the neutron and the proton.
The bound states that I am interested in today are named mesons and they are made of one quark and one antiquark. The properties of some of them, studied in details by the LHCb experiment, exhibit disagreement with the Standard Model.
Before detailing what is going on with these mesons, I would like to emphasize that other more exotic bound states exist too. They are named tetraquarks (2 quarks and 2 antiquarks) and pentaquarks (4 quarks and 1 antiquark).
They interest high-energy physicists a lot, in particular as the LHCb experiment (again ;) ) has discovered some of them during the last three years. More information is available here for those interested.
Finally, it is interesting to mention that hexaquarks could also exist, in principle. While the theory is there, these beast have not been observed so far (even in LHCb).
B-MESONS, D-MESONS AND KAONS
All the anomalies I want to talk about are related to specific mesons: heavy flavor mesons. But what are those guys?
These particles are composite systems, as said above, made of exactly one quark and one antiquark.
[image credits: Wikipedia]
For instance, the most well-known mesons are the pions. They played, for instance, a key role in the discovery of the neutrino, as shown on the picture on the right.
This picture represents tracks of particles in a bubble chamber, and the properties of the various tracks allow physicists to understand what happened in this reaction. The lowest track in the picture, right in the middle of it, is the one of a pion.
Pions consist of systems made of the lightest flavors of quarks (up, down) and they can be electrically neutral or positively or negatively charged (depending on their quark/antiquark content). This comes from the fact that up-antiup or down-antidown pairs are neutral, up-antidown and down-antiup are respectively positively and negatively charged.
Now, let us go back to the topic. Mesons can also be made of heavier quarks like strange, charm or bottom quarks. Those are respectively named kaons, D-mesons and B-mesons.
B-mesons were in particular scrutinized by the LHCb experiment that study their properties very deeply to understand better how the matter-antimatter asymmetry could come from.
FLAVOR ANOMALIES IN B-MESON DECAYS TO KAONS
Now, what about these anomalies?
[image credits: Belle @ KEK]
The first channel where something weird is happening consists in the study of the decay of a B-meson into a kaon and a pair of electrons or a pair of muons.
Also known as a penguin decay. Now you got the title of the post :)
Those decays are rare, and the Standard Model predicts that one should see as much decays into a kaon and an electron-positron pair as decays into a kaon and a muon-antimuon pair.
We are dealing with something called lepton universality: electrons/positrons or muons/antimuons should not make any difference.
LHCb is however observing much more electrons than muons. The number of muons is actually of about 3/4 the number of electrons. The chances for this to be a fluctuation are actually of about 1 in 100.
This is why we are talking about an anomaly and not an evidence (at least yet): This number is still not small enough.
Moreover, those hints persist when we investigate different kaon species! Combining everything, we get a probability for a fluctuation equal to one chance out of 15.000… Still not enough to claim a discovery, but… We start to be close!
A similar effect is observed when the B-mesons are decaying into another strange meson (a meson made of strange quarks) called the phi. Damned: two hints now…
FLAVOR ANOMALIES IN B-MESON DECAYS TO D-MESONS
[image credits: Quantum diaries]
But the story does not end there: B-mesons can also decay into a D meson, a charged lepton and a neutrino. A diagram showing what is going on when a tau lepton is involved is shown on the right.
LHCb has measured the rates when the lepton is a tau, and when it is an electron or a muon. Again, a deviation with respect to the predictions is observed, at the same level as before!
On top of that, it is good to remember that the earlier BaBar experiment at Stanford has recorded some of these anomalies too, but in a more confuse way (due to less data).
TAKE-HOME MESSAGE AND REFERENCES
One of the important message of this post is that the LHCb experiment at the LHC at CERN has made crucial and important observations during the last few years. I am not only talking about the tetraquark and pentaquark business (that I may discuss in another post), but I am actually referring to the so-called flavor anomalies in the decay of B-mesons.
There are real processes named penguins in flavor physics, and the corresponding Standard Model predictions do not seem to agree with data… Other processes involving charmed mesons are also showing hints for unexplained stuff.
To make a long story short: lepton universality seems really to be in a bad shape… But we need more data to draw any conclusive statements.
To get more information on this topic, I recommend the following links:
- One can find more information on these excesses on the LHCb publication webpage.
- A good summary of the excesses (with links to the exact publications) can be found in this article and the references there in.
One can clearly tell that you are living the dream. Keep up the good work. :-)
Kind of. This is not how I was expecting new phenomena to show up. but well... nature is what it is ^^
Such a TOP Topic is Presented in So Simple Way to be understood... Great post for the interested people ... loved @cWorldV99 !!!
Quality post @lemouth.
P.S. no evidence of supersymmetry, yet? Come on! ;)
This is not my fault if nature is not nice with us ;)
this is a mind boggling device humans have created! and great read thanks!
Hola Mr. I have not been upping almost no-one last few days because I must recharge SP over 90%. It went to 14% few days ago and can't use the slider atm. Will up you and everyone soon. I'm sorry about it.
Don't worry @logic, I have been through there too (now I am a bit better, with an adjusted voting strategy ;) )
Whenever I hear of news of "new phenomena" discovered by LHC, I get super excited. I can't wait for us humans to finally crack the elusive theory of everything. I hope we can do it in my own lifetime ;)
I wish to witness some discovery of any kind too (even if it is not the ultimate theory... I can be happy with little :p )
I have heard of this theory that man, as an Observer of the process, can have a significant impact on what is happening. How do you think the fact that the number of electrons more muons in the experiment with the Collider can be attributed to the Observer effect?
I am not really understanding the questions. I will interpolate and try to answer something. Please come back to me if necessary. The theory behind relies on the quantum world, which means that many results are possible when one single collision occurs. However, when billions of collisions occur, we can start using statistics to dig into the results and identify the signals that we are after with a very good accuracy. In all error associated with the measurements, there is always a statistical component related to this. Therefore, this is well accounted for when a claim for an excess is made.
I hope it helps :)
There is a theory that the result of the observation depends not only on external factors, but even from what people watching the experiment. From his expectations too. These cognitive distortions also cause for some error in the analysis of the obtained data. Therefore, different scholars, conducting one and the same experience, can receive different numbers.
Let's wait for the completion of the experiment with the Collider. Will see what happens=))) (sorry for my bad English)
That's not how it works though
But how?
The only effect we have on quantum mechanics comes from our tools, its not our mind.
Everything can be...
what?
Actually, you may be trying to apply a theory (quantum mechanics() that works at the microscopic level to the macroscopic one. Observations are indeed acting on the nature of the system.
Although here it is valid at the microscopic level (the hard process of the collision obeys to the laws of the quantum world), when we are far enough from the collision point (where the detectors are), those effects are not there anymore.
However, this is true that the results of each collision will be different. As I said before, this is why we need to repeat it a lot :)
I agree with You, @lemouth=))) have a wonderful Pushkin poem. It seems contemporary, though written over a hundred fifty years ago.
The translation is not very good. The other is not found
:)
I am not commenting much lately on your posts even if I read them. Truth is, i have no fucking clue what you are saying most of the time and I just try to piece things together.
Oh... I am however trying to put it clearly enough so that anyone could follow. Feel free to ask for clarifications. I would be more than happy to do so (possibly in the chat if you prefer) :)
I must admit that there are so many posts at the moment that I am missing many many posts and that I haven't read many of your posts at the moment I remember one of them I wanted to interact, but then I didn't find the time... I will try to make an effort in the future! I promise!
lol. no man. you don't have to. I am just saying that these are complicated things. I have my own ..issues..with cosmology and physics and I am quite skeptical. that's all. you explain it perfectly. don't worry.
also you don't have to read my rants :)
Well, even if you rant, we can still debate as adults (jsut a good old discussion, but without the beer) ;)
always
CERN is fascinating. But I wonder if we should be meddling with this stuff
Why shouldn't we? :)
We got no idea what the possible results may be.
Well, we now at least a part of them. The rest is just a matter of understanding how the universe works. This can't hurt, no?
I really can't answer that question. I got way more questions then answers my friend :) haha