The question still then remains, what made man, and what spawned that which made man. It still interests us to seek answers into the initial cause of what is, I believe we limit ourselves through language.
Yes man made god, but man did not make man. Even in science the big bang is the end of our knowledge.
Leaving 3-5 words on god seems quite boring, i'm sure I would find your opinion more interesting...
Humankind evolved from precursor species, and we can follow the trail of that evolution back to simple single celled organisms. What spawned the first life form, and where all the matter in the universe came from are deeper questions to ponder. But, just inserting a magical creator to fill in the gaps in our knowledge does not get us any closer to an understanding.
Agreed, jumping to conclusions isn't in our best interest. We have to logically work backward from what we understand to discover the true nature of and the reason for creation. I don't believe the answer to this is god; but neither do I wholeheartedly believe the action of creation to be caused by a completely unsentient force.
That IT may be a monotheistic god, the natural order of a larger cosmic structure and law beyond our universe, or a omnipotent flying spaghetti monster that permeates the fabric of reality.
I do not know, but nobody does. Our language is limiting and this is all I can call IT.
The question still then remains, what made man, and what spawned that which made man. It still interests us to seek answers into the initial cause of what is, I believe we limit ourselves through language.
Yes man made god, but man did not make man. Even in science the big bang is the end of our knowledge.
Leaving 3-5 words on god seems quite boring, i'm sure I would find your opinion more interesting...
Humankind evolved from precursor species, and we can follow the trail of that evolution back to simple single celled organisms. What spawned the first life form, and where all the matter in the universe came from are deeper questions to ponder. But, just inserting a magical creator to fill in the gaps in our knowledge does not get us any closer to an understanding.
Agreed, jumping to conclusions isn't in our best interest. We have to logically work backward from what we understand to discover the true nature of and the reason for creation. I don't believe the answer to this is god; but neither do I wholeheartedly believe the action of creation to be caused by a completely unsentient force.
So what created the single cell organisms????
IT did.
That IT may be a monotheistic god, the natural order of a larger cosmic structure and law beyond our universe, or a omnipotent flying spaghetti monster that permeates the fabric of reality.
I do not know, but nobody does. Our language is limiting and this is all I can call IT.