RE: Utopian Statists And Their Dreams Of A Risk Free World With 'Free' Shit (like a guaranteed basic income)
well the main difference between statists and anarchist utopia is that statist utopia is used in some place: for example in france you have basic income for jobless people.
So at least they try to make in application things, while you, you are just criticizing not doing shit at all to improve the situation.
And yes I am in favor of 'free' helathcare (there is no such things as free healthcare, this is basic healthcare for everyone and everyone contribute to it... ho that's so bad... you won't get any fancy dentistery implant or shit, you'll just get basic stuff, and it is up to you to pay more to get upgrades.... ooohh this is so bad, this is so communist.... NO this is leaving in a society where people care about others...)
ps: "they" don't believe, those things exists in many countries... at that level the US are way beyond western countries standards (even Canada has that)
There's one now...because ONLY a ruling-class can provide charity...you just have to surrender 50%+ of your freedom in order to gain utopia!
This isn't charity, you pay for it.
Being part of a nation, is like being member of some club. You pay a fee and gets advantage being member of it. Some rich people may not need it, but will help lower class people: That's called SOLIDARITY... that's not charity...
No, but I realize you must rationalize your enslavement in order to make yourself feel better...Stockholm Syndrome...
“The government is good at one thing. It knows how to break your legs, and then hand you a crutch and say, 'See if it weren't for the government, you wouldn't be able to walk.”
― Harry Browne