Sort:  

I am not sure of it, and have no information other than that I related here.

I hope you're right, but don't see how I was misleading by pointing out that the hospital has a profit motive for killing kids, since that is the publicly available information regarding the matter.

What information has assured you the hospital didn't sell Alfie's organs? I'd be at least a little less outraged by his forced death if I had some indication they didn't profit from it.

Because he died of a mysterious illness or was inflicted with a mysterious supposedly neurological illness that even up to his death went un- diagnosed, they would never take a chance and place his organs in someone else under those conditions.

Well, you are quite correct--if there aren't other uses for organs. @benswann mentioned they sold them to pharmaceutical companies, not to transplant patients.

Well I guess I will never know what benswann said unless I want to spend twenty minutes trying to watch a five minute video in freeze frames. I wouldn't know why for the life of me a pharmaceutical company would want his remains....if you made it through the video I guess you could enlighten me. I'd still think parents have a right to remains over other entities.

It has been frustrating of late trying to watch Dtube, because of that =/

He didn't say why the pharmaceutical companies bought them, but he did mention that parents weren't informed, until the recent revelation.

I reckon you're right about parents rights, but I reckon they'd have the right to change hospitals too.

I think they have socialized medicine over there, I am sure you lose a lot of rights when given free health care.

Well, that's prolly true, and a line in the sand for me. Particularly when Alfie was availed of dual citizenship, and Italy offered free medical care.

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.26
TRX 0.20
JST 0.038
BTC 96315.76
ETH 3565.22
USDT 1.00
SBD 3.90