You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: UNEXPECTED FLAG DOWN FROM troglodactyl
Thnks for removal of flag and i've also remove the flags on your blog
i missed that comment on https://steemit.com/free/@aaalxnovaphobia/49se3b-free-steem-dollars-sbd-giveaway-21-1-18##@troglodactyl/re-aaalxnovaphobia-49se3b-free-steem-dollars-sbd-giveaway-21-1-18-20180121t230847138z and I sincerely apologize
now i have read your ponzi sheme ;D
I was posting a lot of sbg giveaways in a single day but if i post something like
1)lottery- 2 random winners
2)Prediction of football matches[ i notice u didnt flag it]
3)along with other posts like photography,memes,news,etc...
will that be as you mentioned Destructive because i think its completely different [not ponzi ;D]
The clearest problem to me is the use of the curation system simply to harvest/direct rewards for certain users, rather than to reward any particular activity that might possibly be considered desirable.
The @fairlotto posts you point out serve a purpose beyond just collecting rewards, and any voting on them isn't in direct in exchange for rewards.
Running lotteries or contests based on people actually buying tickets rather than subsidizing the prize pool from voting rewards seems perfectly reasonable to me.
so if i post the concept of lottery same as @fairlotto, will that be considered as plagiarism?
Not by me, though I clearly can't speak for everyone. I'd consider it competition. Try to market it better and/or offer a slimmer house edge, or find some other way to make it more fun than @fairlotto's version.