RE: Science and Religion, A solid proof why the two don't contradict each other, Contributed by @TheManualBot
God bless you for this great inspiration.
One thing I find interesting about bible (the word of God) is that it can be teached from different angle of all the professions of the earth.
A mathematician can teach Bible mathematically that's is the significant of all the numbers in the Bible
A scientist will also teach the same bible scientifically and that is they call Him omniscient
A farmer like myself with teach it agriculturally. Well God is a farmer, he started the creation as a farmer...smile
I can conclude your teaching by saying nothing is new under the heaven, all the new discoveries have their roots in the old but ever new word of God.
You can't separate the two if you have the understanding of how they work.
Naturally, God has provided everything we need and will ever need by creating them, while the science help us to discover them by taking the to lab, do all sort of analysis and come up with why A is preferred over B.
God has done enough to create everything and science is doing enough by keeping discovering what has been created
If you can eat right, their is tendency for you not to fall sick at all, it is both Biblically and scientifically proven.
Glad to have God's word in the community, God bless you richly.
The word of God is full of wisdom and thought. Anyhow, a person may misunderstood what's in the context of each word. He/She must have guidance. :)
The letter killeth, but the spirit gives understanding.
Reading the letter without the interpretation of the Holy Spirit can be as confusing as confusion itself.
Everything is in the word, it is the glory of God to hide a thing, but the honor of a king to search it out.
Preach.... Preacher
The Holy Spirit was sent to teach us ALL things. All we need do is trust in His knowledge.
Nothing added and nothing subtracted.
HalleluYah הַלְּלוּיָהּ Shalom..🕎
Yes indeed, one will then know when to take a lesson literally or in a figurative way.
Love your point on mathematicians being able to teach in their language. I focused on that in my post today, but kept it to that. Not as much content as this great article.