You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: The Panda Virus
Yes, i did. My take, she simply could not imagine that she was talking to the shooter. She assumed it was not him. Hallways with zero carpet probably make guessing shot location impossible. I wish we had a better (more complete) interview to decide better.
Watch the interview again... The reporter was trying to lead her to a different conclusion to what she was saying. He supposedly user and AR15, you cannot shove that down your pants.
The reason most conspiracy theories are discounted is they are so complicated.
Breaking the human psyche is a complicated process with no guaranty of the result.
If I was planing an attack of this nature I would just search social media to find a kid with issues, with the kind of psyche that would be excepted as a school shooter. Lure him one way or another to the location, do the deed and leave him to take the blame. Simple, clean and effective.
That's what i meant by a fuller interview. It was my first question to her. Did he have a gun? I only apply occam's razor to the number of shooters. I believe the shooter was also a victim in that he was quite clearly activated. He had been manifesting as a panda for three months prior and all the phone calls over-and-over.
BTW, I was just writing this tweet/meme about conspiracy when i saw your comment...
This plot must invade every corner of our minds in order to fit the label of a conspiracy. And once defined as such by the people, the truth can never rise. For the tremendous weight of knowing what really happened is only outmatched by the guilt that we have helped it along the way.
I think you are right and i am wrong now.