Anarchy must be avoided, let's see the example of Venezuela

Venezuela is not anarchy. This is a common misconception that the public has is that anarchy = violence. Anarchy really means nobody should be a slave and that individuals should own themselves. It means that borders should not exist to create monopoly power over citizens by a given state to create cattle of them by which the state acts like a parasite from their labor stealing their wages. Tim Draper has talked about nations competing for their citizens in the near future (Estonia and Liberland for example). States commit violence, or rather, badge wearers acting on a legal fiction commit violence against others under command of slave owners (the rulers). Anarchy literally means "no rulers".

What anarchy doesn't mean is lawlessness. You can have rules without rulers. It's called natural law, and nature already lives under these rules for billions of years. What you are living in right now is the end result of statism which is a cataclysm of violence. Anarchy comes later if you're lucky enough to outlast the violence to a point where coercion is no longer necessary in human relationships. Hopefully bitcoin will be a catalyst and later on, smart contracts can replace the legal system (by opting in instead of opting out). I've written about this on my blog here a couple of years back.

Here is a closer example to true anarchy: