And exist somehow orderly organized harmonious in some sense

And exist somehow orderly organized harmonious in some sense arise Then the question It's being to describe it somehow Yes we have to somehow see once how to work with it pre-classical ways of working with the usual definitions to characterize being not fit Yes it I'm saying exactly how the traditional definition of the court is being taken is determined what is part of what it is. Yes, and then we will designate those boundaries which, properly speaking, separate it from one to the next, Tim bunny once Bunny is an animal but not every animal is the same long ears ponytail and that in winter is white and in summer gray Yes, so yes the hare is an animal well, not every animal that possesses any properties. Pancake. It's here But if you did not have any definition of any higher concept part of which would be where there is no problem at all in defining the category They are so abstract that they can not be defined by the usual method of opposing some kind of opposite If we talk about the opposite of being, Essence is such a negative being for the absence is lost there are 2 most abstract ones that exist generally in the language of philosophy being and nothingness or nothing but if we get out determine such basic philosophical things through such an opposition to Tanya from whether we find ourselves in a situation that is not very good from the point of view of a logical point of view, such a purely formal, roughly speaking, so to say, hare Yes, and not a hare being non-being. After all, we are nowhere except to define the existence of such do not let da matter and the Spirit tries sometimes to define it Matter is not counting the imperfect spirit This is something non-material, too, this is used when we are dealing with other less abstract concepts