Time suggests Nick Nick the direct discretion of the

Time suggests Nick Nick the direct discretion of the truth and the difference between the voice and the heidegger is probably the use of the concepts of transcendence registration but for him the notion of students and She approaches the pony YouTube is a level of personal existence close to the concept of the soul and the transcendence level of existence of being in general the most important problem is to jump out one level to another rain manifest through the individual existence of the existence of existence in general, jaspers has an interesting theory explaining the emergence We called japers as one of the main representatives of the religious branch, and others, we should say a few words about his former colleagues to you, the opponent of atheistic existentialists, to call the so-called US probably here, too. All the main figures are probably Jean Paul Sartre say that the soloist of this French atheistic branch, but he is not so willing to philosophize whether they are much more interested in the literary activity of public activities Eve's social activities here are sorts of perhaps the most systematic way of life Ivanov is the author of the greatest probably philosophical works of being and nothing is written by atheistic existentialists but that's not his main job. We know novels with an important work. Socialism is humanism which is considered a manifesto of symbolism. A great job write to run to it and I would like to send students interested in this left-wing direction, which led to the emergence and socialism if we simply did not speak of philosophers Heidegger and the national carrier where Heidegger conducts a cold analysis dasein says and the human finitenesses of aptx death and wiring the philosophical fixation there existentialists began to speak the language of emotion there they turned the philosophical analysis moral and activity is not a promise that we are important for them the most important categories and philosophizing becomes neglected absurdity . But the meaning of life Yes, it is true, and freedom of defarrots can certainly be called a philosopher of Freedom. In fact, his philosophical motivation, his theory, you probably go around in the Middle Ages to American entertainment in essence and essence. According to his sartra, his innovation is the basic property of the human existence of human existence, in him the existence of man precedes essence, that is, we come to the world only after that we begin to create ourselves. Being absolutely in this work freely chooses its development rahat who we become this about it Absolutely true It makes no sense to create activities outside of this activity there is no sense there is an absurdity of the world process and only a person passing into it brings to its meaning and this topic as it was known was picked up by Albert Camus, a younger colleague of a friend in Perm Sartra who proposed an original interpretation of the myth of Sisyphus Camus is worse than the idea is indicated as for the dance for him the main main problems become the problems of discussing the phone is not always accurate and its interpretation of human life is like and this work of Sisyphus that rolls a stone up the mountain knows that it will break down if you know here the operation will have to be repeated again, or someone else will have to repeat if we say within the framework of human life we ​​see the bottom of the selloff by individuals because there is no God at once refuses the idea of ​​God that would sell in which indulged in the distortion of the meaning of it once there is no person, it is originally abandoned by this senseless world and must fight and senselessness and video