RE: The Most Beautiful Girl in The World - Branding & Commodifying Humans
Steemcleaners asked you for routine ID verification after you have been caught plagiarizing content on many posts. You have posted these posts as your own work. Steemit does not does not support and rewards plagiarizm.
Steemcleaners/Cheetah commented on your plagiarized content many times with warnings but you have completely ignored them and kept plagiarizing. On some of our warnings, you responded with aggressive comments.
You plagiarize whole paragraphs from different sources, then mix them up and post article as your own written work without giving sources.
On some other posts you give general sources to books, while it is still copypasta of paragraphs without nothing original added to content.
You have been on the platform for long enough to understand that such behaviour is frowned upon by Steemit community.
Here are examples of some of the articles that you have plagiarized:
https://steemit.com/education/@fugetaboutit/the-two-types-of-intellectuals-academia-defined
Some examples of your aggressive, denial responses:
"MindWar - The Concept of Psychological Warfare (Modern Origins)"
%20%E2%80%94%20Steemit.png)
"Psychological Warfare - The MindWar (MW) Concept and Application "
%20Concept%20and%20Application%20%E2%80%94%20Steemit.png)
"Strategic Communication War - The US Efforts in Contemporary Propaganda Operations "
The so-called aggressive comments are deserved as the use of bots to further demean this platform of real valuable content is exacerbated by this pedantic lunacy. I have seen more then my share of nonsensical trash posts which is written clearly with zero to little care in terms of content, grammar or even style. At least all my posts are unique in terms of the content and I am consistent in terms of the level of material in order to foster more academic and thematic content which is valuable for those individuals seeking serious topics compared to the usual simpleton posts of color challenges, sunsets and food recipes...etc
Btw, in your rush to accuse me of outright plagiarism, you linked as an example my own article which was posted to one of my own domains. Did you seriously think I began writing on THIS level, these kinds of articles on JUST this platform? Instead of making general blanket accusation maybe you should look at the follow up responses and comments I have placed to foster the kind of interactions on this platform which is so rare. Unless you like things as they are, a simple dreadful looking platform then I suggest more if not equal amounts of time working to improve the DESIGN and LOOK instead of perpetuating the Nazi content police role. I was not aware this was akin to graduate school...if so, what format do you require for the references?
The well detailed reponses with sources given by steemcleaners on these posts are clear.
You, self evidently, copied and pasted content from books and researches that you have not written.
Using psychological projection and denialism is not going to change the facts.
Neither will use of red herring (" I have seen more then my share of nonsensical trash posts which is written clearly with zero to little care in terms of content").
The fact that there might be some users posting low quality content or abuse is not justification of your behaviour.
Any user that is caught by steemclenaers abusing Steemit community is dealt with promptly.
Sorry "some users" is an understatement. Just hit the refresh for the new section to get the truth. By far the vast majority of content on this platform is useless drivel with zero quality or care in terms of fostering a better more informative platform in comparison to Facebook ..etc It is ironic verification would require linkage to a competitive but more popular platform. As if Facebook or Twitter for that matter offer anything different or secure in terms of actual ID verification. I also see that you are quick to deride my behavior which is in defense of my content and posts while not accounting for your own, continually posting on my articles cut and paste responses which have zero to do with the actual article. This article for instance. Indeed, even AFTER your beloved Steemcleaners acknowledged and thanked me for complying with the verification of authorship which I have done. Not too mention all of my recent articles have gone through stringent filtering in an effort to comply so why the hate Robbie 2.0? Hmmmm, maybe I should craft some articles on Thai street food such as the less then spicy Tom Kha Kai or perhaps a few out of focus shots of the sunset over the lower east side. Maybe link it as a color challenge which would gain me more favor with the steemit Gods and the mass of less then literate users .
"Some examples of your aggressive, denial responses:"
Ironically, posting on an article which does not violate any of the polices constitutes aggressive harassment responses I would say. Interesting that your entire post does NOT reflect or have anything to do with the present article I have written. Yet you screen-shot aggressive responses from past responses while disregarding your own methods. Why not simply respond to the original post.....why spam my article here with your accusations which have ZERO to do with this article? Nice consistency.
Last one is MY OWN original article which I even mentioned in a comment. Maybe try reading the actual content as opposed to using these silly bots and your platform will potentially attract more serious topics and writers instead of the usual suspects of two line broken grammar, busted syntax and no reference posts of zero quality which inundate the new links on a minute basis.
That article wasn't commented for plagiarizm.
It was only used for comment for identity verification.
https://steemit.com/psychology/@fugetaboutit/strategic-communition-control-the-message-control-the-audience-psyops
Oops My Bad....most be all these cut and paste responses that got me seeing stars
Yes the silly link me routine ID verification. Lol, of course free marketing from one competitive platform like Facebook or Twitter since the content and user base is really a moot point. Did that and done to comply so? Seriously hope a newer and better more robust platform is developed which replaces this Kindergarden project soon. For one, the profiles are a disaster and pathetically simple. In all this time, imagine only the ability to change the cover banner and add your location. pfft. If verification was an issue why are there no more robust feature full options? One would think that would help to avoid spam and sock puppet accounts or let's see the 90% user base only interest in the monetizing incentives as opposed to real thought provoking or engaging content...but nah, bots rule.