You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Twenty-One Thoughts On Psychedelics
Do you have any links, mate? (no gnostic/irvin of course)
...you mean 'no' , then?
Do you have any links, mate? (no gnostic/irvin of course)
...you mean 'no' , then?
Why did you dismiss it as "semantics on language"?
So that's a ....
' No, I don't have any more information from other sources, to substantiate the claim,' then?
Evading the consequences of marginalizing a source, so much for seeking to understand.
So I take it that means that there is no other source...?
Unfortunately there's no way for you to defend your hero at this time, check mate.