You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Twenty-One Thoughts On Psychedelics

in #psychedelics6 years ago (edited)

You can't say any of those substances are like this or that as if environment isn't THE major factor in it all. Situation can posit any of these things as counter to spiritual development and insight, and to quote the CIA mouthpiece that Terrance was as some kind of authority on inner development is like opening up a handbook founded by DARE on what drugs do, as much as incomplete information is the same as incorrect information perhaps some insight might happen (to quote the loving GeraldAndRonda) yet giving matches to kids won't generally give them the idea of match castles.

Sort:  

You can't say any of those substances are like this or that as if environment isn't THE major factor in it all. Situation can posit any of these things as counter to spiritual development and insight

100% correct.

CIA mouthpiece that Terrance

I have found no evidence (that doesn't include Jan irvin semantics on lauguages by the CIA's denial/ gnostic media)

Do you have any links, mate? (no gnostic/irvin of course) ...Interesting....

Break down why and how that evidence is semantic and or inconclusive.

Do you have any links, mate? (no gnostic/irvin of course)

...you mean 'no' , then?

Why did you dismiss it as "semantics on language"?

So that's a ....
' No, I don't have any more information from other sources, to substantiate the claim,' then?

Evading the consequences of marginalizing a source, so much for seeking to understand.

So I take it that means that there is no other source...?

Unfortunately there's no way for you to defend your hero at this time, check mate.

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.19
TRX 0.25
JST 0.035
BTC 98448.47
ETH 2723.35
SBD 3.63