You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: chemtrails over a populated icey area with no farming activity
also peer reviewed papers always have a fudge factor. also WHO paid for the paper matters. i saw nowhere in that paper who paid for it. its important.
also the sample size of experts is too damn small! are you kidding?! 50 experts out of thousands?edit: also what makes them experts? theyre expertise was not listed in the paper.
It seems very much like you haven't read that analysis or any of the papers it links to. It also seems like you have made up your mind, so I'll cease from engaging you any further.
I'll leave you with this page which cites hundreds of sources that'll provide some evidence - http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Chemtrails
Meanwhile, I haven't seen a single ounce of evidence from you - just disconnected images showing different things.
I hope you can leave aside your confirmation bias and accept the evidence; not through random internet websites but peer reviewed papers. Good luck.