Appointing special promoters is a good idea. But we must not forget that each user can be a mini promoter if he posts links to his posts on social networks. If such advertising (but this should apply only to high-quality and original posts, otherwise you can get the opposite effect) is encouraged by curators, then it will definitely live on and will be massive.

Maybe it makes sense to have a promoter who would moderate such links, select valuable content and encourage its authors. I understand this is not the work of one person. This requires teamwork and it's not easy.
But if third-party people see quality content and that it has a price in tokens, they will come to the platform, they will be interested in it.

On the other hand, if you do such link moderation with subsequent reward, it can lead to a wave of "spam". But if you introduce a downgrade of advertised posts for low quality, then this can stabilize the situation.

Maybe I wrote stupid thoughts, but they came into my head and I honestly voiced them :)

It is encouraging that there are people who care about the development of the platform. Now we are going through not the best time. It is just convenient to use for development, now it is better to see who is who.

There are a lot of complaints here about the weak support of newbies. At the same time, the communities are allocated curators with sufficient strength to support. The question is how the representatives and leaders in the communities handle it. But this is another sore subject.

Thank you for your work.