Computation Contest #2 Results and Solution

Solution

The problem of this contest was to find the first zero on the critical line of the riemann zeta function using the following formula:
Screenshot from 2019-10-27 20-41-05.png

I implemented an example solution in java (using a self written implementation of complex numbers which isn't explicitely linked here):

public class ZeroFinder {
    public static Complex zeta(Complex in, int n) {
        Complex res = new Complex(0, 0);
        for(int j = 1; j < n; j++) {
            res = res.plus(in.negate().times(Math.log(j+1)).ePow().times(j).minus(in.negate().times(Math.log(j)).ePow().times(in.negate().plus(j))));
        }
        return res;
    }
    public static void main(String [] args) {
        // Find the first 10 zeros in the real part:
        int [] list = new int[10];
        int index = 0;
        Complex last = new Complex(0, 0);
        for(int i = 1; index < 10; i++) {
            Complex next = zeta(new Complex(0.5, i/10.0), 1000);
            //System.out.println(next);
            if(last.r*next.r < 0) { // Check if the value of r changes sign
                list[index] = i;
                index++;
            }
            last = next;
        }
        
        // Look at the first zeros in more detail and check if there is also an imaginary zero:
        double y0 = 0;
        outer:
        for(int i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
            last = new Complex(0, 0);
            for(int j = 0; j < 1000; j++) {
                double y = list[i]/10.0+j/1000.0-0.5;
                Complex next = zeta(new Complex(0.5, y), 10000);
                if(next.i*last.i < 0) { // Check if the value of i changes sign
                    y0 = y;
                    break outer;
                }
                last = next;
            }
        }
        
        // Look at the region in even more detail:
        double resI = 0, resR = 0;
        last = new Complex(0, 0);
        for(int i = 0; i < 1000; i++) {
            double y = y0+(i-500)/10000.0;
            Complex next = zeta(new Complex(0.5, y), 1000000);
            if(next.i*last.i < 0) { // Check if the value of i changes sign
                resI = y;
            }
            if(next.r*last.r < 0) { // Check if the value of r changes sign
                resR = y;
            }
            last = next;
        }
        System.out.println((resR+resI)/2); // Print the average of resR and resI which should be more accurate.
    }
}

This code prints the result 14.1332 which is not perfectly accurate even though I used 1000000 iterations in the final run.

↓↑↓↑↓↑↓↑↓↑↓↑↓↑↓↑↓↑↓↑↓↑↓↑↓↑↓↑↓↑↓↑↓↑↓↑↓↑↓↑↓↑↓↑↓↑↓↑↓

List of participants with their entries:

NameSolution found
@tonimontana14.141171601414683A lot of digits for the fact that the fourth digit is already off.
@crokkon14.1

↓↑↓↑↓↑↓↑↓↑↓↑↓↑↓↑↓↑↓↑↓↑↓↑↓↑↓↑↓↑↓↑↓↑↓↑↓↑↓↑↓↑↓↑↓↑↓↑↓

Winners:

As promised 2 SBI for everyone!

↓↑↓↑↓↑↓↑↓↑↓↑↓↑↓↑↓↑↓↑↓↑↓↑↓↑↓↑↓↑↓↑↓↑↓↑↓↑↓↑↓↑↓↑↓↑↓↑↓

The next contest starts in 2 days. Don't miss it!

Sort:  

Do we even know that the zeros of the truncated sum have anything to do with the zeros of the real function? Like say you havefirefox_20191101_235635.png Then f is 0 but all the finite sums have no zeros.

There is an important difference between the sum I chose and the function you show:
Your function won't give a graph where you could read the zeros( by checking for sign changes).

If you have a sum that converges then you can conclude that your graph will be within some small range ε of the graph of the infinite sum. So the zeros you can read in the partial sum graph should also closely match those in the infinite sum graph.

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.22
TRX 0.20
JST 0.034
BTC 93257.09
ETH 3124.16
USDT 1.00
SBD 3.15