Now, if not Kant's opponents in this case relied

Now, if not Kant's opponents in this case relied on some data according to which human contemplation is not three-dimensional for 4 or 5 minutes or that it is such that in it through a point not lying on a given line one can either not conduct either a parallel line or as much as this case would be an argument against the position of Kant But in this case, two very important provisions. Well, how do we know this space and time that is known to man that is naively taken for space and time by itself This is the space tv-time itself according to Kant's thought does not exist and we are one of the main conclusions of the transcendental aesthetics of the critique of pure reason according to which all that we cognize but recognize only in space and time which is a game of knowledge means what objects or things in themselves in non-ways knowledge we do not know and can not know in principle and no science today neither tomorrow nor What scientific revolutions do not believe in this And by the way I go back to beautiful polemics with the edging here this thesis which I am now with Kant considered the key crisis of the so-called transcendental idealism and of course I can not be very happy