In my opinion, Jill Stein is a much better candidate that Gary Johnson. There really is no good excuse for not knowing what Aleppo is, and Johnson's recent inability to name a single world leader he admires just makes it worse. Also, recent reports state that climate change is ALREADY at the point of disaster and we can't even build a single new fossil fuel project if we want to have any chance of avoiding more disasters and sea level rise etc., and Johnson does not take climate change seriously at all. He also supports the TPP. He's rather foolish and severely lacking on various issues. I personally want third parties to get more exposure and participate in the debates, but frankly, I think Johnson would make third parties look bad if he made it in. He declined to debate Jill Stein on Democracy Now's expansion of the first debate, so Stein simply went on and answered the debate questions alone. Compare their platforms and how they perform in interviews, etc.