Sort:  

Such requires the participation of all involved parties.

After all, 'one' reason why there is so much war in certain quarters of the World is because they do not generally communicate in the same language - and thus their media dehumanization is made all the easier to the populations of invader nations and their cohorts. Opinion Engineering 101.

Had there been a healthy degree of communication external to those nations then people would be more likely to ask questions.

Comparing this to Hitler is a bit out of proportion. It was much more organized, the circumstances were different, the methods were different, the public was in a different position, the background was different. They started as a political party that was elected. Don't compare this with one of the sadest pages of our history.

"Widespread economic misery, fear, and perception of worse times to come, as well as anger and impatience with the apparent failure of the government to manage the crisis, offered fertile ground for the rise of Adolf Hitler and his Nazi Party."
https://www.ushmm.org/wlc/en/article.php?ModuleId=10008206

Note that I'm not approving anything, just keeping things in context.

No, it started before Hitler got elected. He got elected because (For example the SA formed in 1922 I think out of several right wing groups that were ready for violence and showed that openly. Now look at the video again.)
For the rest lets take your quote, okay?

"Widespread economic misery" - 2008 crisis, still ongoing, lot's of areas with bad job opportunities, leader rallying them under "get jobs back in the country" - checked

"fear" - of the Muslims and the Mews and the Soros - checked

"and perception of worse times to come" - Ee will lose our jobs! We will lose our country! Ethnic cleansing my muslim terrorist! - checked

"as well as anger and impatience with the apparent failure of the government to manage the crisis" - do I need to comment on this? - checked

See, all your points of what gave rise to Hitler are 100% fulfiilled

You're taking it out of context. There always is fear (of the future), there is always disbelief in the government,...

The Weimar Republic unemployment was over 30%, compared to US 5% and US economy is doing well.

The US unemployment is even more rigged then our German ;)

Anyway this is not what you have to look at. You are talking logical points. But the Nazis or the Neonazis are not being logical.

The see that the Rich (which they equal with jews and banking) get richer (which is true) while they get poorer - which is also objectivly true for the last 10-20%.
An for those that are still "middle class" they fear to drop down - which is also based on reality numbers, since the middle class is shrinking because the differences between low and top get bigger.

And for the t of context I friendly, but strongly disagree. Maybe I don't know enough about the US situation. But for me it looks very very similar. All I hear I already have heard and seen from the old Nazis.

btw. I just see this on twitter, so take it with a ;)

Liberal arts college professor brutalizes Nazi, who has a permit. More alt-left indoctrination.

source

pattonoswalt Patton Oswalt tweeted @ 15 Aug 2017 - 21:52 UTC

Liberal arts college professor brutalizes Nazi, who has a permit. More alt-left indoctrination. https://t.co/knrhHuPNDl

Disclaimer: I am just a bot trying to be helpful.

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.15
TRX 0.16
JST 0.028
BTC 67814.21
ETH 2401.94
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.34