Is George Soros Really Trying to Destroy the World?
I've been hearing a lot about Soros from some prophetic type Christian ministers and others who have never been known for being well informed. I got the distinct feeling most if not all of those criticizing him don't really know much about him, just like most criticizing Islam don't know much about it.
So I decided to do some research about him to find out just why this guy is such a threat to humanity and discovered he supports several things that I support, like taking care of refugees who come to America, something I've been involved with for decades. I looked through the many non-profits he supports and found several that I support, including human rights organizations. I found this article to give some balancing considerations which just might show he ain't as bad as people make him out to be - kind of a mixed bag, some good and some bad, just like Trump and numerous other influential people: http://www.businessinsider.com/george-soros-new-world-order-2011-9
I think those who parrot "He's trying to destroy the world" are way out on a limb.
From the article:
"He provided crucial support to civil-society movements throughout the Soviet bloc. He probably did more than any other private citizen in the West to nudge European Communism into history's dustbin."
This is the irony of conspiracy theories that Soros is an evil enemy of freedom--he directly aided the establishment of Eastern European democracy. That said, his global interventions aren't always high-minded. He did blow up the British pound, after all.
He's actually been promoting ways to keep people like himself from being able to manipulate currency markets. I wonder what he thinks of crypto?
When i was a child I'd see starving kids on tv and super rich people were telling me i should give more to charity to help these poor starving children. 35 years later i see the same starving children on tv and the same tipes, the richest of the rich trying to convince me to give more to charity. Turns out less than 1 percent goes to the so called cause. Someone is pocketing the money/influence/power and it aint the starving children.
Thanks for the comment. Can you explain how this relates to what I wrote?
Soros is a very very rich man who runs a lot of charities. He got rich manipulating currencies, crashing whole counties stock markets, not mention taking properties from fellow Jews for the Nazis. He is one of those guys getting rich while telling little old me i should be more socialist and give more to his orgs. No thanks. Did he not say he thought he was the messiah? As for crypro, i bet he has more of them than anyone else.
Yea man, he donates shit tons of money to all those organizations so he can pretty much tell them whatever the hell he wants and they do it.
Isn't it odd so many "human rights orgs" like UNICEF and the infamous Clinton Foundation are being exposed for the sham and scam on humanity that they are, ya know, the ones he funds?
Half the sources that write about this guy, are on his payroll. Of course they won't say anything bad.
DUH!
I don't have a problem with UNICEF. They are doing good work.
Well... just take some time to do a little digging. Like most of these "charitable" organizations started by these satanic globalists, they have a functioning appearance of being a positive force for good, when in reality they have been assisting in the smuggling and trafficking of children and grown adults as well for use in satanic murder rituals and sexual deviance... But that will never be out in the public forum, until its too late.
Of course you're probably thinking, "Man, this guy is a kook.." Well, if you do think that, then I am sorry, but I tried. If instead you're reading this with an open mind, then good on you and good luck out there.
Or you could just provide me with some documentation that UNICEF is smuggling kids to work in the sex industry or get sacrificed in some satanic ritual. I have a investigative journalist friend from an Eastern European country where he says the president has been part of a smuggling outfit but he never mentioned anything about any charities being involved. Not saying individuals don't use their connections to traffic people but you make it sound like UNICEF was created as a front with the real intention of smuggling people. How did you come to that conclusion? Don't just say it, document it. Also, do you believe a person can't be a globalist without being satanic?
Just one recent example of people who operate UNICEF
https://steemit.com/news/@ura-soul/unicef-children-s-rights-campaigner-is-jailed-for-rape-of-boy-13-why-it-s-tough-to-find-an-honest-charity-and-what-we-can-do-to
I came to this conclusion after hours of absorbing info from other investigative reports, obviously.
Your last question is a double negative and I am not entirely sure what you meant. But I will try to answer: I believe there can exist a non satanic globalist. But globalism is inherently evil so...?
I clearly don't have a physical proof besides court records and odd interactions. The answer is out there.
Just look to @morphonios' channel for more insight.
How does the fact that one employee of UNICEF, or several, raped a boy or boys demonstrate that the organization was created as a front for sex trafficking?
https://steemit.com/news/@lukewearechange/secretive-group-of-elites-meet-in-california-infographic
Herbert Hoover co-founder of UNICEF was a long time member of our favorite secret gathering group, the Bohemian Grove.
So?
To the question in your title, my Magic 8-Ball says:
Hi! I'm a bot, and this answer was posted automatically. Check this post out for more information.
Boost Your Post. Send 0.100 STEEM or SBD and your post url on memo and we will resteem your post on 5000+ followers. check our account to see the follower count.
https://www.facebook.com/inthenow/videos/954742131342823/
The interview George Soros tried to ban from the internet ^