You bring up some good things here. Although I like what Trump says far more than Clinton, and of those 2 "choices" I prefer Trump, I won't vote for either. I am of the opinion that despite the rhetoric, Trump has been "vetted" by the real movers and shakers of this world and has gotten approval. I don't trust him or his words any more than all the other politicians I've ever seen.

I've been waiting to see a really good investigation into Trump's connections to finance and powerful people, to really shine a light on him to get some insight on what his real, actual perspective is on how he plans to "Make America Great Again".

Very disappointed in Stephan Molyneux's lack of objectiveness in evaluating Trump. He has made a huge shift towards statism IMO with how he is tracking Trump and changed the topics he focuses on at FDR. I don't have nearly the confidence and respect for him I once did as a result of where he has taken FDR in the last year or 2.

Corbett has had a few good podcasts on the US elections this year, but mostly focused on Clinton. Given the choices, I believe Corbett's position is to discuss why statism is bad, that he endorses no candidates, but highlights the extreme corruption he sees in any candidate, which so far has been mostly Clinton.