---

Today the NTC has been replaced by the General National Congress which is currently fighting for power against rival groups in a civil war that started in 2014 and has resulted, thousands of casualties, 1.5 million food insecure people and 62% of the population not having access to health services (Pradella and Rad, 2017: 2419). This article has analyzed the humanitarian argument for the NATO intervention as well as the anti-imperial and “non-exhaustion of diplomatic measures” arguments against military intervention.

When assessing the merits of an intervention it is necessary to look at both the motivations as well the outcomes. Through the assessment and analysis of the merits it has become clear that the publicly endorsed and primary argument for military intervention was unsound and based on false motivations. Furthermore, the NATO military intervention overstepped its mandate and hyperbolized the regional support it received by excluding to view the AU as a regional actor. The argument was hypocritical, contributed to civilian casualties and acted as a Trojan horse for western imperialism. The arguments against the NATO military intervention require some scrutiny but based on the theory and evidence provided, their arguments and words of caution have rung clear.

The proponents of the anti-imperialist argument might have placed too much emphasis on the motivation for oil contracts in Libya but the western interest in oil, the neoliberal policy imposition and importance of Libya’s geopolitical positionality have all been shown to be true. Additionally, the argument against western military intervention, based on the premise that not all non-military means had been exhausted, also holds value when looking at the AU’s attempts for diplomatic action. Even though the AU’s initiatives were limited in their execution and they lacked consensus amongst themselves, with NATO support, diplomatic measures would have stood a chance (de Waal, 2012).

The NATO military intervention in Libya should not have happened because it was grounded on the flaws of the humanitarian argument, it had dubious imperialist motives and neglected propositions for diplomatic alternatives that could have prevented a civil war from taking place.

References

---

The references below are for the entire piece if you find it more helpful to have the references in each individual post please let me know!

Alberts, T. (2011) The African Union and Libya, on the Horns of a Dilemma. African Arguments. Available at: http://africanarguments.org/2011/11/02/the-african-union-and-libya-on-the-horns-of-a-dilemma-by-thomas-alberts/ (Accessed: 3 December 2017).

Bellamy, A.J. and Williams, P.D. (2011) The New Politics of Protection? Cote d’Ivoire, Libya and the Responsibility to Protect. International Affairs. 87(4), p. 825-850. Available at: https://academic.oup.com/ia/article/87/4/825/2417126 (Accessed: 5 December 2017).

Bricmont, J. (2006) Humanitarian Imperialism: Using Human Rights to Sell War. New York: New York City Press.

Bricmont, J. (2011) Libya and the Return of Humanitarian Imperialism. Counterpunch. Available at: https://www.counterpunch.org/2011/03/08/libya-and-the-return-of-humanitarian-imperialism/ (Accessed: 14 December 2017).

Bush, R., Martiniello, G., and Mercer, C. (2011) Humanitarian Imperialism. Review of African Political Economy. 38(129), p. 357-365.

Chivvis, C.S. (2014) Toppling Qaddafi: Libya and the Limits of Liberal Intervention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

de Waal, A. (2012) The African Union and the Libya Conflict of 2011. World Peace Foundation. Available at: https://sites.tufts.edu/reinventingpeace/2012/12/19/the-african-union-and-the-libya-conflict-of-2011/ (Accessed: 5 December 2017).

Dominguez, A.M. and Pitt-Rashid, T. (2012) International Intervention and its Humanitarian Consequences in Libya and Beyond: An Unresolved Issue. Open Democracy. Available at: https://www.opendemocracy.net/alvaro-mellado-dominguez-tom-pitt-rashid/international-intervention-and-its-humanitarian-consequence (Accessed: 11 December 2017).

Fermor, C. (2012) NATO Decision to Intervene in Libya (2011): Realist Principles or Humanitarian Norms? Journal of Politics and International Studies. 8, p. 323-361. Available at: http://www.polis.leeds.ac.uk/assets/files/students/student-journal/ug-winter-12/130217-win12-chris-fermor-9.pdf (Accessed: 4 December 2017).

Hoff, B. (2016) Hillary Emails Reveal True Motive for Libya Intervention. Foreign Policy Journal. Available at: https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2016/01/06/new-hillary-emails-reveal-true-motive-for-libya-intervention/ (Accessed: 29 November 2017).

House of Commons Foreign Affairs Committee (2016) Libya: Examination of Intervention and Collapse and the UK’s Future Policy Options. Available at: https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201617/cmselect/cmfaff/119/119.pdf (Accessed 5 December 2017).

Kasaija, P.A. (2013) The African Union (AU), The Libya Crisis and the Notion of “African Solutions to African Problems.” Journal of Contemporary African Studies. 31(1), p. 117-138. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/02589001.2012.761463 (Accessed: 3 December 2017).

Kimball, A. (2014) Modern European Imperialism = Rise and Fall? University of Oregon. Available at: http://pages.uoregon.edu/kimball/ggr.frn.MPR.gnr.htm (Accessed: 4 December 2017).

Klein, N. (2007) The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism. London: Penguin Group.

Kuperman, A.J. (2013) A Model Humanitarian Intervention: Reassessing NATO’s Libya Campaign. International Security. 38(1), p. 105-136. Available at: http://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/abs/10.1162/ISEC_a_00126 (Accessed: 10 December 2017).

Lopez, G. (2015) Responsibility to Protect at a Crossroads: The Crisis in Libya. Humanity in Action. Available at: https://www.humanityinaction.org/knowledgebase/580-responsibility-to-protect-at-a-crossroads-the-crisis-in-libya (Accessed: 5 December 2017).

Petras, J. and Veltmeyer, H. (2011) Beyond Neoliberalism: A World to Win. New York: Routledge.

Pradella, L. and Rad, T. S. (2017) Libya and Europe: Imperialism, Crisis and Migration. Third World Quarterly. 38(11), p. 2411-2427. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2017.1350819 (Accessed: 9 December 2017).

Rand, C.R. (2013) Intervention in Libya: Resistance and Co-option in the Emerging Hegemony. Honors Thesis. Whitman College, Washington. Available at: http://arminda.whitman.edu/theses/180/ (Accessed: 5 December 2017).

Selfa, L. (2011a) Is U.S Intervention Justified in Libya? Socialist Worker. Available at: http://socialistworker.org/2011/03/29/is-intervention-justified-in-libya?quicktabs_sw-recent-articles=6-1 (Accessed: 5 December 2017).

Selfa, L. (2011b) Libya’s Revolution, U.S Intervention and the Left. International Socialist Review. Available at: https://isreview.org/issue/77/libyas-revolution-us-intervention-and-left (Accessed: 5 December 2017).

The Nation (2011) The Libya Intervention. Available at: https://www.thenation.com/article/libya-intervention/ (Accessed: 3 December 2017).

Tisdall, S. (2011) Soft Power is the Best Way for the West to Intervene. The Guardian. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2011/mar/08/soft-power-west-intervene-libya (Accessed: 29 November 2017).

Tripathi, D. (2011) The Dynamic of Mission Creep in Libya. Foreign Policy Journal. Available at: https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2011/04/24/the-dynamic-of-mission-creep-in-libya/ (Accessed: 4 December 2017).

Wedgewood, A and Dorn, W.A (2015) NATO’s Libya Campaign 2011: Just or Unjust to What Degree? Diplomacy & Statecraft. 26(2), p. 341-362. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/09592296.2015.1034573 (Accessed: 3 December 2017).

Weston, F. (2011) No to Imperialist Intervention in Libya. In Defence of Marxism. Available at: http://www.marxist.com/no-to-imperialist-intervention-in-libya.htm (Accessed: 5 December 2017).

Zunes, S. (2011) Libya: Was Armed Revolt and Western Intervention the Only Option? Huffington Post. Available at: https://www.huffingtonpost.com/stephen-zunes/libya-was-armed-revolt-an_b_841753.html (Accessed: 4 December 2017).