RE: What If Russia And Cuba Held Joint Millitary Exercises Simulating An Attack On The USA Every Year?
As far as Libya goes there are UK and former Libyan officials who say he was involved and a Libyan intelligence officer was the only person ever jailed for the attack. Even if he wasn't involved and new nothing about it, his regime was involved in a number of other terrorist attacks. He was no innocent in that regard.
You can point at the Patriot Act and say what an awful law it is and I would agree with you 100%. The fact remains though that this is a far, far more open society than that of North Korea and the North Korean leadership can and does get away with far, far more awful things against its own people. There is no comparison here...at all. I can freely criticize my government without fear of imprisonment or execution. And I don't know where you are living but I don't know very many (or any really) people that believe our government officials whole heartedly. But despite the flaws of this country, I strongly disagree that we are worse than North Korea or Libya. It just isn't so.
And full blown wargames ARE a norm. There are various very large exercises performed by many countries and a number of them are performed annually. There are certainly some that are scheduled to make a point (legitimate or not) but those are usually small by comparison (e.g. recent bombers flying over the Korean peninsula). The larger events take a long time to schedule and are usually done on an annual or longer schedule.
I agree that our posture is sometimes over aggressive but I also see extreme risks in countries like North Korea or Iran getting nuclear weapons. Nuclear weapons are the only potential existential threat to the U.S. I consider it extremely unlikely that the U.S. would ever launch a nuclear first strike on anybody. There's just too much to lose. And even given Trumps habit of aggressive speaking, he hasn't threatened anything other than retaliation if attacked first. This is not how the leaders of Iran and Korea speak. They threaten destruction so often then we tend to ignore it. But that may not always be wise. What should Japan's response be if one of those missiles that NK keeps launching overhead lands on them, even if by accident? How about the U.S. as their ally? The U.S. may be holding military exercises but they aren't launching ballistic missiles over north korea.
I'm not sure where you get the idea that the yuan is backed by gold. It isn't. In fact they peg it to the U.S. dollar (or some percent thereof) by fiat. China has been buying a lot of gold in recent years but despite this it currently holds less than half of what the U.S. holds (and the dollar certainly isn't backed by gold) even by the highest estimates. I think the petro dollar concept is a bit overrated. With the supposed emphasis on green energy, this is going to become less of an issue over time anyway. Even if it didn't, the U.S. has vast untapped reserves of oil, coal and natural gas of its own. I wonder what it will be priced in?
I think the issue with North Korea could be solved diplomatically if NK would agree to give up nuclear weapons. I don't think that will happen though.
Yes, Saudi involvement in 9/11 is not a conspiracy theory or even something that is not well known. It has repeatedly been reported by even mainstream media often and early. That doesn't mean that the Taliban had nothing to do with it. Just because many of the hijackers were from Saudi Arabia and derived funding from their doesn't make them not Al-Qaeda or Bin Laden not the mastermind or the Taliban not the protector of Bin Laden. Personally, I think the whole "nation building" (or whatever you want to call it) that has gone on in Afghanistan is stupid and counterproductive as was the invasion of Iraq. They should have stopped after capturing or killing Bin Laden and the Taliban leadership. That should have been "mission accomplished". Iraq certainly did have WMDs but they were just old and no longer effective. The U.S. knew he had them because we gave them to him years previous. Regardless, it certainly wasn't enough to invade over and has obviously been counterproductive as has every other nation building exercise.
Don't get me wrong. I do think U.S. foreign policy is pretty horrible in many cases. I just don't think the U.S. or its leadership is as bad as that of North Korea or Iran. Or even close.
As far as Syria, I think the U.S. should just get out. I think we would agree on that. As far as who gassed who, as of a year ago the U.N. did in fact conclude that it was Assad who gassed his own people, on at least two occasions in 2014 and 2015. He is accused of doing it many more times but that has not been proven conclusively.
Well as I said, we probably aren't going to agree. In regards to the yuan going over to oil sales on backed securities, an article on the topic is here:
https://www.marketslant.com/article/golden-yuan-crude-backed-gold-here
The UN investigation into gas attacks has significantly cooled but is still ongoing. The general consensus is that they have been perpetrated by the US backed forces. But due to the fact that most of the Hague prosecuting team is largely NATO appointed it will probably never see a full follow through. Carla Delponte actually resigned as an investigator simply due to the fact that she knew the prosecution of the responsible parties would never occur. An article that covers some details can be found here:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/syria/10039672/UN-accuses-Syrian-rebels-of-chemical-weapons-use.html
In regards to the Taliban.... Have you been to Afghanistan? Our war there is completely and utterly so disconnected from it's initial reasons that it's clear it was never our intention in the first place. However, if you look into the Pentagon backed surveys into the countries precious metal resources that were done in 2000 then the picture becomes clearer. Many more surveys followed after but if you like you can take a look on the subject and decide yourself. Don't just read a handful of articles.
In regards to the US.... Here's a document from your own government to give a read:
https://info.publicintelligence.net/USArmy-InternmentResettlement.pdf
Interestingly in regards to Gadafi... I invite you to look in depth into our various hot cold era's in relationship to the "terrorism" reported. You'll find in depth cooperation at different points in our history in regards to the exporting of terrorism endorsed by the US from Lybia. In regards to North Korea? I think you have a very media driven understanding of the North. Not a bad thing as most Americans do. The North on many occasions has approached a point of cooling in regards to it's nuclear program. When I was in Seoul there was even the beginnings of economic cooperation between the the North and South where workers were being bused in to work at various manufacturing outlets making things like cook wear. The North has on multiple occasions voiced a want for diplomatic talks and been reasonable in this. Interestingly that posture and those announcements never see the light of day in the US or Western world. Everywhere else in Asian Media as well as Russian but never in the US. I know many Americans who after a brief period in these countries go back to the US scratching their head as to why we are being so aggressive when peace would be incredibly easy to approach. The North will only be a threat to the US and their allies if provoked which is exactly what we are doing today. The US not being as bad. Well we will have to agree to disagree. I see it as a totalitarian police state in the making but that's my perception. It wasn't always that way but it is now. You have less than 5 percent of the global population yet over a quarter of the worlds imprisoned population rest in the good ol' land of the free. My stance is not one of anti America but rather anti American pro war propaganda. You need to take a look at how that's executed. By simply reading Edward Bernays books on propaganda or public relations the playbook is there. Given that he helped found the Council On Foreign Relations and various other round table groups that still heavily influence everything from foreign policy to media the books are relevant. I can see where you are coming from and once used to think the same. But the US government has long ago passed into the realms of being indefensible in regards to it's foriegn policy. As far as motive in regards to Russia or China? Just look at current sweetening between those countries and Saudi Arabia. Saying the concept of the petrodollar being over rated does show a gross misunderstanding of global and US economics that is far to lengthy for me to cover in this response. But having said all of this I do thank you for the time to respond as well as well as the feed back. Best of luck with your projects and write up's and steem on.