I just followed you of course, and you know that. Dehumanizing people as "triggered" is also pretty ableist and doesnt really advance a discussion much. I'm talking to you right now and judging what you say in the moment. If that's not good enough feel free to extrapolate on any miscommuniction.

And yes, we would have. Science was developed in less capitalist societies just as well if it better in many places. Capitalism and innovation are not congruent in any fashion. Imagine a world without sharing our knowledge. Why is communism ok when it comes to sharing research, but not ok everywhere else?

Science and data literally explains the happiness index and how it functions. Also it is controlling to prevent billions of people from eating, but o guess that doesnt matter since that's built into the system and not relevant, right?

Anarchy is actually the direct opposite of capitalism. Capitalism directly involves monetary hierarchy that unequalizes the playing field, people will always have more power than others. Anarchy involves a system where we are all equal without rule of state. You cannot have anarchy and capitalism.

"""Voluntary exchange""" for rich people is cool in theory, but again, it's all sacrificing the lives of billions of others. You think capitalism works because you aren't directly exposed to the people that are being thrown away like garbage as a result of your greed and roleplaying. We dont live in a meritocracy and pretending like we do is foolish and ignorant.

Communism doesnt require human force. Climate change is going to force us all to abandon this failed capitalist system soon enough.

Anarchy and communism go hand in hand. No one should have power and rule over others. Capitalism cannot exist with anarchy by definition. You are wrong and very misguided.

Posted using Partiko Android