You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Planet X Destroyer evidence...OK...Now I'm really paying attention.
As the sun moves, the angle of the light from the sun hits the smudge on the lens at a different angle.
Any planet that close to Earth would have already had cataclysmic effects on Earth, and there'd be zero question as to whether it existed or not.
There is zero possibility that image is a planet.
We have no idea how close is close, or the constitution of said planet. A very thinly-compacted gaseous planet could be close without having yet-catastrophic effects. We do know both volcanism and serious earthquake activity are on the rise, and we know they had no cameras when that drawing was made centuries ago.
The gravitational force of any planet able to be a planet appearing to be that size from Earth would devastate our planet. A wispy cloud of gas does not maintain a spherical shape. The sphere is a product of that gravity.
The rise of volcanism and earthquakes is predicted by research based on other factors, and has nothing to do with Planet X. I suspect there is a planet X, but that we don't see it because it's very far away. It's also predicted from orbital artifacts, and would not be the first planet sought because of that.
You can test yourself if a camera with a smudge on the screen would reveal a similar artifact in a dark room with a laser pointer. The lens is at a different distance from the light source than the shutter, therefore parallax makes the smudge appear to move.