Interesting post. I see it as follows, instead of talking about causes and effects, which refer to the past and the future par excellence, talk about reasons, which refer to the eternal present. Thus, instead of asking ourselves why a problem arises, we ask ourselves why this problem is necessary in the present, what role does it play in the present for which it exists.

But as you say, a "why" is not always necessary, only one solution is needed, and that solution may simply be there is no problem.

Nor do I think that a unilateral vision of things is necessary, it is only necessary to learn to speak the language that everyone speaks, so to speak, to learn to reach a consensus in a multilateral way. Because everyone speaks with their own personal language that they learned in their daily lives, and for which many times in appearance there is disagreement when in fact they are only touching the same elephant for different parts (if you understand the reference).

I will take the glass marble by the way. Very thanks!

Excellent writing. Regards!