The Era of Colosseums is Past
As life evolves, there is always something to underscore.
The Colosseums of Rome is from a bygone era of centuries past and good riddance. When men fought animals to their death it was something to abhor. But with men still fighting today, it’s a corrosive shame. There has never been anything good about being forced or voluntarily giving in to the worst impulse a person could exercise.
In the regressive days of Colosseum fighting it was called entertainment but why was a fighting that ended in a killing was ever entertaining? It could only be when dysfunction was something to revel because the brain didn’t know better. Even today it represents the worst side of the brain and there is yet no humanity in it. Benevolence is sensible. Today it should be clearer than any other time that a fighting-killing defines a heteroclite psychopathy. A fighter can kill and no matter how one defines a slayer, whether a mass killer, a terrorist, one who kills in the heat of the moment, a plotting gangster-murderer, assassin, a jealous soul or one who simply indulges evil, has to be recognized and defined for what they are, an heteroclite personality, as aforementioned, no excuses.
In an advanced society fighting for what it means cannot be overemphasized and underscored for how it makes humanity look. Sorry! There is no exception for sports and entertainment, fighting is psychological. No explanation justifies a fight as okay, not from how it starts to how it ends, and surely when it ends in a death. Sensitive hearts feel it is untoward of one who likes watching a fight and their reverence is as questionable as the fighter, even fighters of wars.
Society would do well to remember disasters don’t wait for people to change their ways.
The vigor in fighting has no worth. It is a renegade prospect, the enemy of good, and even though the extent of it is not measurable, it is known to be big enough to destroy persons and relatives, friends and neighbors; cities and countries.
In this moment of time and technological advancement, it’s time for twenty-first century tough questions. Least, we are shamed for paralleling ourselves with those far beneath the technological age of today. Since centuries past, where are we now? What does current society say about us, the people? Does happiness conquer hate? Is a hateful person unhappy? Do we make the possibility for happiness complicated when it’s a simple prospect? Should we all work together to make one another happy; is it possible? Or, do we want to fight and care less about a perfect world?
Therefore we ask, then, where does humanity find protection? Some believe it is in a spirit nature out in the atmosphere. The spirit nature becomes the equalizer, keeping things in check. There is some sequence and system to life and nothing is left to chance. It is a system that imports its wrath upon the wrongful. One reaps what they sow; what goes around comes around aligns with the universe. Otherwise, if one live by the sword, they die by the sword. The best things in life relegates to those who do unto others as they would have others do unto them. Such declarations are not cliché. There is something in life and nature that requires order and goodness. Let’s pay attention to those who live a gratuitous existence, those who live and let live. When we ignore life’s spirit nature, without care for good and order the universe cry out. Then, society pays a price through a continuous churning of chaos down through the centuries affecting ancestry to no end. Cordiality makes good energy and pleases the universe.
“Sticks and stones are hard on bones Aimed with angry art. Words can sting like anything But silence breaks the heart,” said Phyllis Mcginley. – but oh, the context of today, when it’s purposefully filled with hate and vengeance, it all hurts equally or greater and it all means something dire in the nature of humans.