You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Naturalistic morality (an anarchist's perspective)
I think morality is objective when based only on objective premisses (reason and science) , and subjective otherwise, ie, based on personal beliefs, faith, dogmas, etc..
My contention is that since morality has to do with what we ought to do, there is no way to establish this using only facts about the way the world is. That's the is-ought distinction.
However, I would say that ethics based on objective premises are very likely to be better than those based on personal belief, faith, and dogma