RE: Being Individually Moral but Forced to Live Among Collective Immorality
Objective morality? Makes it sound like you personally know all the secrets and the ultimate truth, the problem is just the others that don't see the truth as you do.
I believe there are topics which will never bow down to a single agreed definition of objective morality.
Is it moral to allow low IQ voters to have same weight to their vote as high IQ voters?
Is it moral to allow individuals who have never paid any taxes in their lives to have same weight to their vote as an individual who is in top 1% of taxpayers?
Is it moral to allow abortion after 6 months? after 8 months? after 9 months?
Is it moral for high per capita GDP countries to seal their borders, and make decisions in the best interest of the country, on who they want to allow to cross the countries border and become future citizens?
Is it moral for people to be judged by today's moral standards, for actions that are alleged but never proven to have occurred 30 or 40 years ago?university level schools?
Is it moral for hate groups (i.e. Black Lives Matter) to use violence and intimidation, in the pursuit of their view of justice for generational crimes?
Is it moral to pretend that "gender studies" is a serious subject at
Many hard questions for which I doubt a single "objective morality" will ever be universally agreed.
Is it moral for groups (any group) to use violence and intimidation, in the pursuit of their view?
Is it moral for an individual (any individual) to use violence and intimidation, in the pursuit of their view?
is it moral to pretend democracy is men scratching a box every few years with a pen chained to the table so they cannot steal it, not that they would want that greasy, germy plastic?