You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Strong Proof: On Omnipotence
I love logic too, but a proof in logic does not necessarily proveor disprove an actual reality.
The un-stated assumption in your argument is that reality conforms to conceptual word based logic.
Posted using Partiko Android
A philosophy need not be “true,” merely consistent. Insofar as a worldview contains contradictions, it must necessarily be false...to hold that any one being is omnipotent is self-contradictory.
I agree with consistency as a necessity for a stable worldview.
An entity being omnipotent seems contradictory in the context of duality, but what about in the context of pure monism?
If there is only one entity/power/substance/reality then the question of it's ability to destroy or not destroy itself is meaningless.
The totality remains the totality always.
I appreciate this realm of thoughtful considerations but have some tangible realities to attend to.
Thanks for the thought provoking thread!
Posted using Partiko Android