You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Climate State's Year 2017 in Review
With respect, it is not global warming that threatens us, it is global cooling due to a grand solar minimum. If you are genuinely concerned about the welfare of humanity then I suggest you check a couple of my posts on the subject which present an alternative perspective on the science that has nothing to do with big oil and everything to do with the welfare of humanity. If I am right and I hope I am not, but if I am then we as a species face a threat barreling down on us and will be here in full force within a few years.
Peace
@daemon-nice
The sun activity is down, yet Earth experiences record breaking temperatures. Because the warming is two to three times more pronounced in the Arctic it effects the polar vortex (jet stream), pushing colder air into lower latitudes and vis versa. However, there could be indeed a cooling in the northern hemisphere taking place, if the gulf stream is shutting down, prominently featured in the movie The Day After Tomorrow. Also iceberg breakup from collapsing glaciers will contribute to cooling. How this plays out is not yet very much studied, but it is unrelated to the solar cycle.
With all respect you are misinformed. The earth is not experiencing record-breaking temperatures except as far as cold records being broken globally. The agencies involved with the GW agenda have been caught faking data and changing historical climate data and the propaganda arm of the corporate governments do not share info that runs counter to their agenda. Arctic ice is growing, more importantly so is Antarctic ice growing and its summer down there.
It has everything to do with the 22-year solar cycle as well as the Milankovitch cycles and evidence of this is the fact that most of the planets in our solar system are experiencing climate change. This then suggests that there is a central source for such change and that is the sun.
IPCC and the global warming alarmist's predictions have failed and it is this that determines the validity of a hypothesis. Failed predictions equal a failed hypothesis.
When An Inconvenient Truth came out I believed it too and started to look into the science of it and found some interesting things such as an alleged science organization has a political mandate, dissenting data is shouted down. The whole hysteria from politicians and dire warnings from the elites truly made me wary. Since when have these top pier wealth hoarders ever cared for us regular poor folk. They and their families have been about population control and eugenics and they go out of their way to promote, but of course, never putting their money where their mouth is and volunteering to depopulate themselves.
Before you dismiss me all I ask is that you look into Piers Corbin, Dave Dilley, Ben Davidson of Suspicious 0bservers on youtube and Adapt 2030. Piers Corbyn has a successful climate model that allows him to have an 80% accuracy in long-term weather forecasting and has been correct when the consensus science of forecasting has been wrong, proving science does not work by consensus. There is a great deal of research which supports my statements that the mainstream media does not report on and the IPCC ignores because it is not part of their agenda to prove man-made climate change.
I am not a part of a big oil agenda and would love to see us move away from such dependence on such a toxic substance. I am concerned for the welfare of humanity. I know you care about the planet and humanity, so do I.
Peace
@daemon-nice